摘要
共犯处罚根据论是德、日区分制共犯理论为狭义的共犯寻找实质处罚依据的理论。目前因果共犯论处于通说的支配地位,但其实质内涵只是基于共犯行为与构成要件的不法结果之间存在刑法上的因果关系来合理地限制共犯的处罚范围。随着共犯与正犯的区分标准由形式客观说向实质客观理论的转变,以“限制正犯”概念为逻辑起点的共犯处罚根据论因失去前提性支撑而存在明显逻辑缺陷。其不能在片面对象犯等具体问题上得出符合我国客观实际的结论,其与违法的本质立场之争交织使共犯论的问题更加难以得出一致结论,其存在的必要性也因共犯从属性无法得到贯彻而受到根本性的质疑。
The theory of the basis of punishment for accomplice is the theory of finding substantial punishment basis for accomplice in narrow sense according to the theory of accomplice in Germany and Japan.At present,the causal accomplice theory is in the dominant position of the general theory,but its essential connotation is only based on the criminal law causality between the accomplice behavior and the illegal result of the constitutive elements to reasonably limit the scope of punishment of the accomplice.With the change of the standard of distinction between accomplice and principal offender from formal objective theory to substantive objective theory,the theory of punishment basis of accomplice,which takes the concept of“limiting principal offender”as the logical starting point,has obvious logical defects because of losing the premise support.It can not draw a conclusion in line with the objective reality of our country on specific issues such as one-sided object crime,and the dispute between it and the essential position of the violation of the law makes it more difficult to draw a consistent conclusion on the theory of accomplice.The necessity of its existence is also fundamentally questioned because the subordinate attribute of the accomplice can not be carried out.
出处
《刑法论丛》
2021年第4期349-377,共29页
Criminal Law Review
基金
国家社科基金重大项目:(网络金融犯罪的综合治理,项目号:17ZDA148)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
共犯处罚根据论
内涵解析
逻辑缺陷
存在必要性
The Theory of the Basis of Punishment for Accomplice
Connotation Analysis
Logic Defect
Necessity of Existence
