摘要
《哥达纲领批判》是马克思晚年在远非一种“享受”状态下完成的“拯救灵魂”之作。由于马克思在该文献中再度采用了久违的批判文风,加之该文献篇幅短小且议题分散,从而使一部分人要么偏狭地认为其充其量只是体现了某种“派性之争”,要么将之指认为一种“直白”甚或“粗陋”的“经验性陈述”。此类看法的问题在于:忽视了马克思针对《哥达纲领》中劳动、分配、“自由国家”等议题展开的揭露与批驳,看似零散而简略,实则均一致性地指向“倒退”的《哥达纲领》缺乏历史性和阶级性理论分析维度这一最深层、最根本的弊端。
“Critique of The Gothic Program”is Marx’s“soul-saving”work in his later years.in a state far from“enjoyment”.Marx adopted again in the literature criticism style,combined with the literature regarding short and the topics are scattered,thus,some people narrowly believe that this document is only a manifestation of factionalism,or superficially refer to it as a“straightforward”or even“crude”“empirical statement”.The mistake with this view lies in ignoring the inherent inheritance of this criticism and Marx’s previous thought or theory,ignoring this criticism is actually the concentrated embodiment of some mature views of Marx in his later years,in particular,ignoring Marx’s revelation and criticism of labor,distribution,the“Free Country”and other issues in“Gotha Programme”,which seems scattered and simple,but in fact consistently points out the deepest and most fundamental drawback that the“retrogressive”“Gotha Programme”lacks historical and class analysis dimension.
出处
《政治经济学研究》
2022年第3期18-31,共14页
Chinese Journal of Political Economics
关键词
马克思
哥达纲领批判
劳动
分配
自由国家
Karl Marx
Critique of the Gotha Program
Labor
Distribution
Free Country