目的:研究双相障碍抑郁发作(简称双相抑郁)患者决策风格与临床特征的相关性。方法:采用病例对照研究,用墨尔本决策问卷(Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire,MDMQ)评估决策风格,比较双相抑郁患者(n=30)与健康被试(n=30)MDMQ总分及...目的:研究双相障碍抑郁发作(简称双相抑郁)患者决策风格与临床特征的相关性。方法:采用病例对照研究,用墨尔本决策问卷(Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire,MDMQ)评估决策风格,比较双相抑郁患者(n=30)与健康被试(n=30)MDMQ总分及因子分的差异,分析MDMQ各项评分与双相抑郁患者临床特征的相关性及MDMQ评分对双相抑郁患者与健康对照者的鉴别效能。结果:双相抑郁组MDMQ总分以及过度警觉、拖延和推卸责任的因子分均高于健康对照组(p值分别<0.001、<0.05、<0.05、<0.05);双相抑郁患者的MDMQ总分和因子分与汉密尔顿抑郁量表-24项(24-item Hamilton Depression Scale,HAMD-24)总分、汉密尔顿焦虑量表总分不相关;MDMQ总分和过度警觉因子分、推卸责任因子分与HAMD-24的认知障碍因子分正相关(依次为:r=0.437,p<0.05;r=0.470,p<0.05;r=0.421,p<0.05);MDMQ拖延因子分还与HAMD-24的日夜变化因子分正相关(r=0.376,p<0.05),与HAMD-24的睡眠障碍因子分负相关(r=-0.460,p<0.05);受试者工作特征曲线分析显示最佳界值为5时,MDMQ拖延因子分对双相抑郁发作的曲线下面积为0.701。结论:双相抑郁患者存在独特的决策风格,这可能是疾病的临床特质之一,并在疾病的诊断中发挥一定的作用。展开更多
Background Various differences between China and Japan in approaches to medical treatment have been noted,but a few studies have examined differences in medical decision-making,especially in neonatal care.The aim of t...Background Various differences between China and Japan in approaches to medical treatment have been noted,but a few studies have examined differences in medical decision-making,especially in neonatal care.The aim of this study was to clarify these differences by means of a questionnaire.Methods The subjects were physicians on the staff of NICUs in China and Japan.The study questionnaire consisted of three parts dealing with the general characteristics of the participants,questions about treatment strategies for hypothetical,critically ill infants,and general questions about the treatment of foreign patients.The Likert scale was used to assess the treatment strategies and the results were analyzed statistically.Subgroup analysis by age,sex,and medical and NICU experience was also performed.Results The proportion of respondents in the Chinese and Japanese groups was 26/26 (100%) and 26/31 (84%),respectively.There was a significant difference between the Chinese and Japanese groups for 8 of 75 questions;Chinese physicians chose the positive treatment or examination options for these eight questions unlike their Japanese counterparts.The responses of the younger,less experienced physicians in both countries were more similar to each other,and more positive than those of their older,more experienced colleagues.Conclusion Chinese physicians showed a more positive attitude toward examination and treatment,whereas Japanese physicians showed a more cautious attitude.展开更多
The following paper attempts to understand if income determines the buying decision-making styles of consumers in Bhubaneswar,the capital city of Odisha,a state located on eastern India.A total of 103 respondents of B...The following paper attempts to understand if income determines the buying decision-making styles of consumers in Bhubaneswar,the capital city of Odisha,a state located on eastern India.A total of 103 respondents of Bhubaneswar were chosen by using the Mall intercept method.The samples were classified into three groups based on their average annual family income such as High Income,Middle Income and Low Income groups.Exploratory Factor Analysis was carried to identify the decision-making styles.ANOVA was employed to compare the shopping styles of these three income sub-groups.Results indicate that differences in consumer shopping styles exist among the income sub-groups.Findings of the study can be used by marketers for segmentation,targeting and positioning of retail shoppers which may facilitate them to compete efficiently.It is recommended that different income sub-groups should be viewed as distinct consumer segments and strategies should be formulated to cater each segment effectively.展开更多
文摘目的:研究双相障碍抑郁发作(简称双相抑郁)患者决策风格与临床特征的相关性。方法:采用病例对照研究,用墨尔本决策问卷(Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire,MDMQ)评估决策风格,比较双相抑郁患者(n=30)与健康被试(n=30)MDMQ总分及因子分的差异,分析MDMQ各项评分与双相抑郁患者临床特征的相关性及MDMQ评分对双相抑郁患者与健康对照者的鉴别效能。结果:双相抑郁组MDMQ总分以及过度警觉、拖延和推卸责任的因子分均高于健康对照组(p值分别<0.001、<0.05、<0.05、<0.05);双相抑郁患者的MDMQ总分和因子分与汉密尔顿抑郁量表-24项(24-item Hamilton Depression Scale,HAMD-24)总分、汉密尔顿焦虑量表总分不相关;MDMQ总分和过度警觉因子分、推卸责任因子分与HAMD-24的认知障碍因子分正相关(依次为:r=0.437,p<0.05;r=0.470,p<0.05;r=0.421,p<0.05);MDMQ拖延因子分还与HAMD-24的日夜变化因子分正相关(r=0.376,p<0.05),与HAMD-24的睡眠障碍因子分负相关(r=-0.460,p<0.05);受试者工作特征曲线分析显示最佳界值为5时,MDMQ拖延因子分对双相抑郁发作的曲线下面积为0.701。结论:双相抑郁患者存在独特的决策风格,这可能是疾病的临床特质之一,并在疾病的诊断中发挥一定的作用。
文摘Background Various differences between China and Japan in approaches to medical treatment have been noted,but a few studies have examined differences in medical decision-making,especially in neonatal care.The aim of this study was to clarify these differences by means of a questionnaire.Methods The subjects were physicians on the staff of NICUs in China and Japan.The study questionnaire consisted of three parts dealing with the general characteristics of the participants,questions about treatment strategies for hypothetical,critically ill infants,and general questions about the treatment of foreign patients.The Likert scale was used to assess the treatment strategies and the results were analyzed statistically.Subgroup analysis by age,sex,and medical and NICU experience was also performed.Results The proportion of respondents in the Chinese and Japanese groups was 26/26 (100%) and 26/31 (84%),respectively.There was a significant difference between the Chinese and Japanese groups for 8 of 75 questions;Chinese physicians chose the positive treatment or examination options for these eight questions unlike their Japanese counterparts.The responses of the younger,less experienced physicians in both countries were more similar to each other,and more positive than those of their older,more experienced colleagues.Conclusion Chinese physicians showed a more positive attitude toward examination and treatment,whereas Japanese physicians showed a more cautious attitude.
文摘The following paper attempts to understand if income determines the buying decision-making styles of consumers in Bhubaneswar,the capital city of Odisha,a state located on eastern India.A total of 103 respondents of Bhubaneswar were chosen by using the Mall intercept method.The samples were classified into three groups based on their average annual family income such as High Income,Middle Income and Low Income groups.Exploratory Factor Analysis was carried to identify the decision-making styles.ANOVA was employed to compare the shopping styles of these three income sub-groups.Results indicate that differences in consumer shopping styles exist among the income sub-groups.Findings of the study can be used by marketers for segmentation,targeting and positioning of retail shoppers which may facilitate them to compete efficiently.It is recommended that different income sub-groups should be viewed as distinct consumer segments and strategies should be formulated to cater each segment effectively.
