The authors adopted bloodletting atWeizhong(UB 40)for the treatment ofacute lumbar sprain with good results.Incomparison with groups of massage andphysiotherapy,the present method was su-perior,as reported in the foll...The authors adopted bloodletting atWeizhong(UB 40)for the treatment ofacute lumbar sprain with good results.Incomparison with groups of massage andphysiotherapy,the present method was su-perior,as reported in the following:展开更多
We have adopted acupuncturing acupointDongru to treat breast diseases caused by differ-ent factors. Among 50 cases, 26 cases belong totubercle,and 24 cases are breast cyst with un-clear swelling. The patients are 4 ma...We have adopted acupuncturing acupointDongru to treat breast diseases caused by differ-ent factors. Among 50 cases, 26 cases belong totubercle,and 24 cases are breast cyst with un-clear swelling. The patients are 4 males and 46females, aging from 19 to 62. The duration ofillness was from 15 days to 20 years. The treat-展开更多
目的比较腹腔镜胆总管探查术中直针法与弯针法两种缝合技术的效果。方法 104例腹腔镜胆总管探查术患者的临床资料,按照术中采用的缝合技术将研究对象分为两组:直针法缝合组50例,弯针法缝合组54例,比较两组患者的手术进行时间、术中出血...目的比较腹腔镜胆总管探查术中直针法与弯针法两种缝合技术的效果。方法 104例腹腔镜胆总管探查术患者的临床资料,按照术中采用的缝合技术将研究对象分为两组:直针法缝合组50例,弯针法缝合组54例,比较两组患者的手术进行时间、术中出血量、胆总管取石情况、术后肛门排气时间、术后下床活动时间、术后并发症发生情况、术后住院时间及住院费用等变量情况。结果两组患者均手术成功,无死亡病例,无中转开腹。直针法缝合组手术时间短于弯针法缝合组手术时间(6.1±1.4 min vs 12.4±2.3 min)(P<0.01);两组的胆总管取石数目、术后肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、发生胆漏数量、住院时间及住院费用差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论直针法缝合技术比弯针法耗时短,具有明显优势。展开更多
文摘The authors adopted bloodletting atWeizhong(UB 40)for the treatment ofacute lumbar sprain with good results.Incomparison with groups of massage andphysiotherapy,the present method was su-perior,as reported in the following:
文摘We have adopted acupuncturing acupointDongru to treat breast diseases caused by differ-ent factors. Among 50 cases, 26 cases belong totubercle,and 24 cases are breast cyst with un-clear swelling. The patients are 4 males and 46females, aging from 19 to 62. The duration ofillness was from 15 days to 20 years. The treat-
文摘目的比较腹腔镜胆总管探查术中直针法与弯针法两种缝合技术的效果。方法 104例腹腔镜胆总管探查术患者的临床资料,按照术中采用的缝合技术将研究对象分为两组:直针法缝合组50例,弯针法缝合组54例,比较两组患者的手术进行时间、术中出血量、胆总管取石情况、术后肛门排气时间、术后下床活动时间、术后并发症发生情况、术后住院时间及住院费用等变量情况。结果两组患者均手术成功,无死亡病例,无中转开腹。直针法缝合组手术时间短于弯针法缝合组手术时间(6.1±1.4 min vs 12.4±2.3 min)(P<0.01);两组的胆总管取石数目、术后肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、发生胆漏数量、住院时间及住院费用差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论直针法缝合技术比弯针法耗时短,具有明显优势。
