AIM:To investigate computed tomography(CT) and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) manifestations of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs) in order to enhance the recognition of these rare tumors.METHODS:Fourteen ...AIM:To investigate computed tomography(CT) and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) manifestations of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs) in order to enhance the recognition of these rare tumors.METHODS:Fourteen patients with pathologically proven rectal GISTs were retrospectively reviewed.Patient histories were retrospectively reviewed for patient age,gender,presenting symptoms,endoscopic investigations,operation notes and pathologic slides.All tumors were evaluated for CD117,CD34 expression,and the tumors were stratified according to current criteria of the National Institutes of Health(NIH).In all cases the first pre-operation imaging findings(CT and MRI,n = 3;MRI only,n = 8;CT only,n = 3) were analyzed by two experienced radiologists by consensus,which include:tumor size,shape,CT density(hypodense,isodense and hyperdense),MRI signal intensity(hypointense,isointense and hyperintense),epicenter(intraluminal or extraluminal),margin(well-defined or ill-defined),internal component(presence of calcifications,necrosis,hemorrhage or ulceration),pattern and degree of enhancement,invasion into adjacent structures.After review of the radiologic studies,clinical and pathological findings were correlated with radiological findings.RESULTS:The patients,13 men and 1 woman,were aged 31-62 years(mean = 51.5 ± 10.7 years).The most common initial presentation was hematochezia(n = 6).The mean tumor diameter was 5.68 ± 2.64 cm(range 1.5-11.2 cm).Eight lesions were round or oval,and 6 lesions were irregular.Eleven lesions were welldefined and 3 had ill-defined margins.Ten tumors were extraluminal and 4 were intraluminal.The density and MR signal intensity of the solid component of the lesions were similar to that of muscle on unenhanced CT(n = 6) and T1-weighted images(n = 11),and hyperintense on T2-weighted MR images.Calcification was detected in 2 tumors.Following intravenous injection of contrast media,3 lesions had mild enhancement and 11 lesions had moderate enhancement.Enhancement was homogenous in 3 lesions and heter展开更多
AIM:To investigate the short-term outcome of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision(TME) in patients with mid and low rectal cancers.METHODS:A consecutive series of 138 patients with middle and low rectal cancer were ...AIM:To investigate the short-term outcome of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision(TME) in patients with mid and low rectal cancers.METHODS:A consecutive series of 138 patients with middle and low rectal cancer were randomly assigned to either the laparoscopic TME(LTME) group or the open TME(OTME) group between September 2008 and July 2011 at the Department of Colorectal Cancer of Shanghai Cancer Center,Fudan University and pathological data,as well as surgical technique were reviewed retrospectively.Short-term clinical and oncological outcome were compared in these two groups.Patients were followed in the outpatient clinic 2 wk after the surgery and then every 3 mo in the first year if no adjuvant chemoradiation was indicated.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 software.RESULTS:Sixty-seven patients were treated with LTME and 71 patients were treated with OTME(sex ratio 1.3:1vs 1.29:1,age 58.4 ± 13.6 years vs 59.6 ± 9.4 years,respectively).The resection was considered curative in all cases.The sphincter-preserving rate was 65.7%(44/67) vs 60.6%(43/71),P = 0.046;mean blood loss was 86.9 ± 37.6 mL vs 119.1 ± 32.7 mL,P = 0.018;postoperative analgesia was 2.1 ± 0.6 d vs 3.9 ± 1.8 d,P = 0.008;duration of urinary drainage was 4.7 ± 1.8 d vs 6.9 ± 3.4 d,P = 0.016,respectively.The conversion rate was 2.99%.The complication rate,circumferential margin involvement,distal margins and lymph node yield were similar for both procedures.No port site recurrence,anastomotic recurrence or mortality was observed during a median follow-up period of 21 mo(range:9-56 mo).CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic TME is safe and feasible,with an oncological adequacy comparable to the open approach.Further studies with more patients and longer follow-up are needed to confirm the present results.展开更多
AIM: To determine the effective hospitalization period as the clinical pathway to prepare patients for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study which included 189 pa...AIM: To determine the effective hospitalization period as the clinical pathway to prepare patients for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study which included 189 patients consecutively treated by ESD at the National Cancer Center Hospital from May 2007 to March 2009. Patients were divided into 2 groups; patients in group A were discharged in 5 d and patients in group B included those who stayed longer than 5 d. The following data were collected for both groups: mean hospitalization period, tumor site, median tumor size, post-ESD rectal bleeding requiring urgent endoscopy, perforation during or after ESD, abdominal pain, fever above 38 ℃, and blood test results positive for inflammatory markers before and after ESD. Each parameter was compared after data collection. RESULTS: A total of 83% (156/189) of all patients could be discharged from the hospital on day 3 postESD. Complications were observed in 12.1% (23/189) of patients. Perforation occurred in 3.7% (7/189) of patients. All the perforations occurred during the ESD procedure and they were managed with endoscopic clipping. The incidence of post-operative bleeding was 2.6% (5/189); all the cases involved rectal bleeding. We divided the subjects into 2 groups: tumor diameter ≥ 4 cm and < 4 cm; there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.93, χ 2 test with Yates correction). The incidence of abdominal pain was 3.7% (7/189). All the cases occurred on the day of the procedure or the next day. The median white blood cell count was 6800 ± 2280 (cells/μL; ± SD) for group A, and 7700 ± 2775 (cells/μL; ± SD) for group B, showing a statistically significant difference (P = 0.023, t-test). The mean C-reactive protein values the day after ESD were 0.4 ± 1.3 mg/dL and 0.5 ± 1.3 mg/dL for groups A and B, respectively, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.54, t -test). CONCLUSION: One-day admission is sufficient in the absence of complications during ESD or early postop展开更多
AIM： To determine the accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging （MRI） using phasedarray coil for preoperative assessment of T staging and mesorectal fascia infiltration in rectal cancer with rectal dis...AIM： To determine the accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging （MRI） using phasedarray coil for preoperative assessment of T staging and mesorectal fascia infiltration in rectal cancer with rectal distention.METHODS： In a prospective study of 67 patients with primary rectal cancer, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging （in-plane resolution, 0.66 × 0.56） with phased-array coil were performed for T-staging and measurement of distance between the tumor and the mesorectal fascia. The assessment of MRI was compared with postoperative histopathologic findings. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were evaluated.RESULTS： The overall magnetic resonance accuracy was 85.1% for Tstaging and 88% for predicting mesorectal fascia involvement. Magnetic resonance sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was 70%, 97.9%, 89.6%, 93.3% and 88.5% for ≤ T2 tumors, 90.5% , 76% , 85.1%, 86.4% and 82.6% for T3 tumors, 100%, 95.2%, 95.5% , 62.5% and 100% for T4 tumors, and 80% , 90.4%, 88%, 70.6% and 9d% for predicting mesorectal fascia involvement, respectively.CONCLUSION： High-resolution MRI enables accurate preoperative assessment for T staging and mesorectal fascia infiltration in rectal cancer with rectal distention.展开更多
基金Supported by Key Program of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission,No.09441900500
文摘AIM:To investigate computed tomography(CT) and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) manifestations of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs) in order to enhance the recognition of these rare tumors.METHODS:Fourteen patients with pathologically proven rectal GISTs were retrospectively reviewed.Patient histories were retrospectively reviewed for patient age,gender,presenting symptoms,endoscopic investigations,operation notes and pathologic slides.All tumors were evaluated for CD117,CD34 expression,and the tumors were stratified according to current criteria of the National Institutes of Health(NIH).In all cases the first pre-operation imaging findings(CT and MRI,n = 3;MRI only,n = 8;CT only,n = 3) were analyzed by two experienced radiologists by consensus,which include:tumor size,shape,CT density(hypodense,isodense and hyperdense),MRI signal intensity(hypointense,isointense and hyperintense),epicenter(intraluminal or extraluminal),margin(well-defined or ill-defined),internal component(presence of calcifications,necrosis,hemorrhage or ulceration),pattern and degree of enhancement,invasion into adjacent structures.After review of the radiologic studies,clinical and pathological findings were correlated with radiological findings.RESULTS:The patients,13 men and 1 woman,were aged 31-62 years(mean = 51.5 ± 10.7 years).The most common initial presentation was hematochezia(n = 6).The mean tumor diameter was 5.68 ± 2.64 cm(range 1.5-11.2 cm).Eight lesions were round or oval,and 6 lesions were irregular.Eleven lesions were welldefined and 3 had ill-defined margins.Ten tumors were extraluminal and 4 were intraluminal.The density and MR signal intensity of the solid component of the lesions were similar to that of muscle on unenhanced CT(n = 6) and T1-weighted images(n = 11),and hyperintense on T2-weighted MR images.Calcification was detected in 2 tumors.Following intravenous injection of contrast media,3 lesions had mild enhancement and 11 lesions had moderate enhancement.Enhancement was homogenous in 3 lesions and heter
文摘AIM:To investigate the short-term outcome of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision(TME) in patients with mid and low rectal cancers.METHODS:A consecutive series of 138 patients with middle and low rectal cancer were randomly assigned to either the laparoscopic TME(LTME) group or the open TME(OTME) group between September 2008 and July 2011 at the Department of Colorectal Cancer of Shanghai Cancer Center,Fudan University and pathological data,as well as surgical technique were reviewed retrospectively.Short-term clinical and oncological outcome were compared in these two groups.Patients were followed in the outpatient clinic 2 wk after the surgery and then every 3 mo in the first year if no adjuvant chemoradiation was indicated.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 software.RESULTS:Sixty-seven patients were treated with LTME and 71 patients were treated with OTME(sex ratio 1.3:1vs 1.29:1,age 58.4 ± 13.6 years vs 59.6 ± 9.4 years,respectively).The resection was considered curative in all cases.The sphincter-preserving rate was 65.7%(44/67) vs 60.6%(43/71),P = 0.046;mean blood loss was 86.9 ± 37.6 mL vs 119.1 ± 32.7 mL,P = 0.018;postoperative analgesia was 2.1 ± 0.6 d vs 3.9 ± 1.8 d,P = 0.008;duration of urinary drainage was 4.7 ± 1.8 d vs 6.9 ± 3.4 d,P = 0.016,respectively.The conversion rate was 2.99%.The complication rate,circumferential margin involvement,distal margins and lymph node yield were similar for both procedures.No port site recurrence,anastomotic recurrence or mortality was observed during a median follow-up period of 21 mo(range:9-56 mo).CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic TME is safe and feasible,with an oncological adequacy comparable to the open approach.Further studies with more patients and longer follow-up are needed to confirm the present results.
基金Supported by Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research, No. 18S-2 from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare to Saito Y
文摘AIM: To determine the effective hospitalization period as the clinical pathway to prepare patients for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study which included 189 patients consecutively treated by ESD at the National Cancer Center Hospital from May 2007 to March 2009. Patients were divided into 2 groups; patients in group A were discharged in 5 d and patients in group B included those who stayed longer than 5 d. The following data were collected for both groups: mean hospitalization period, tumor site, median tumor size, post-ESD rectal bleeding requiring urgent endoscopy, perforation during or after ESD, abdominal pain, fever above 38 ℃, and blood test results positive for inflammatory markers before and after ESD. Each parameter was compared after data collection. RESULTS: A total of 83% (156/189) of all patients could be discharged from the hospital on day 3 postESD. Complications were observed in 12.1% (23/189) of patients. Perforation occurred in 3.7% (7/189) of patients. All the perforations occurred during the ESD procedure and they were managed with endoscopic clipping. The incidence of post-operative bleeding was 2.6% (5/189); all the cases involved rectal bleeding. We divided the subjects into 2 groups: tumor diameter ≥ 4 cm and < 4 cm; there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.93, χ 2 test with Yates correction). The incidence of abdominal pain was 3.7% (7/189). All the cases occurred on the day of the procedure or the next day. The median white blood cell count was 6800 ± 2280 (cells/μL; ± SD) for group A, and 7700 ± 2775 (cells/μL; ± SD) for group B, showing a statistically significant difference (P = 0.023, t-test). The mean C-reactive protein values the day after ESD were 0.4 ± 1.3 mg/dL and 0.5 ± 1.3 mg/dL for groups A and B, respectively, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.54, t -test). CONCLUSION: One-day admission is sufficient in the absence of complications during ESD or early postop
文摘AIM： To determine the accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging （MRI） using phasedarray coil for preoperative assessment of T staging and mesorectal fascia infiltration in rectal cancer with rectal distention.METHODS： In a prospective study of 67 patients with primary rectal cancer, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging （in-plane resolution, 0.66 × 0.56） with phased-array coil were performed for T-staging and measurement of distance between the tumor and the mesorectal fascia. The assessment of MRI was compared with postoperative histopathologic findings. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were evaluated.RESULTS： The overall magnetic resonance accuracy was 85.1% for Tstaging and 88% for predicting mesorectal fascia involvement. Magnetic resonance sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was 70%, 97.9%, 89.6%, 93.3% and 88.5% for ≤ T2 tumors, 90.5% , 76% , 85.1%, 86.4% and 82.6% for T3 tumors, 100%, 95.2%, 95.5% , 62.5% and 100% for T4 tumors, and 80% , 90.4%, 88%, 70.6% and 9d% for predicting mesorectal fascia involvement, respectively.CONCLUSION： High-resolution MRI enables accurate preoperative assessment for T staging and mesorectal fascia infiltration in rectal cancer with rectal distention.
