期刊文献+

吻合器痔上黏膜钉合术后直肠狭窄 被引量:55

Rectal stenosis following procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨吻合器痔上黏膜钉合术(PPH)后直肠狭窄的发生情况及处理方法。方法回顾性分析2000年7月至2004年12月共554例行PPH术患者的临床资料和术后随访资料。结果共随访了489例患者,随访率88.3%(489/554),平均随访时间(324±18)d。共12例(12/489, 2.5%)患者在术后89-134(125±5)d出现了直肠狭窄,均可通过肠镜下气囊扩张或切开狭窄环而治愈。术后直肠狭窄的患者术前接受硬化剂治疗(58.3%vs.20.0%,P=0.02)和术后严重疼痛(25.0%vs.6.7%,P=0.003)的比率明显高于术后无直肠狭窄的患者。而两者性别(P=0.32)、既往痔手术史(P=0.11)、手术标本中有鳞形细胞(P=0.77)和术后复发率(P=0.53)的差异无统计学意义。结论PPH术前有硬化剂注射史和术后严重疼痛的患者较易发生术后直肠狭窄,多在术后4个月内发生。 Objective To evaluate stenosis of the lower rectum foLlowing PPH with special respect to potential predictive factors or stenotic events. Methods A retrospective analysis of 554 consecutive patients, which underwent PPH from July 2000 to December 2004 was performed. Results Only patients with foLlow-up check were evaluated, thus the analysis includes 489 palients(489/554,88.3% ) with a mean foLlow-up of (324 + 18)days. Rectal stenosis was observed in 12 patients (12/489,2. 5% ), the median time to stenosis was 89-134 ( 125 ± 5 ) days. All the patients complained of obstructive defecation and underwent strictureplasty with electrocautery or ballon dilation through colonosoepy. A statistical analysis revealed that patients with stenosis had significantly more often prior sclerosis therapy for hemorrhoids (58.3% vs. 20.0%,P=0.02) and severe postoperative pain (25.0% vs. 6.7%,P=0.003). Other factors, such as gender ( P = 0. 32 ), prior surgery for hemorrhoids ( P = 0. 11 ), histological evidence of squamous skin ( P = 0. 77) or revision ( P = 0. 53 ) showed no significance. Conduslon Rectal stenosis is an uncommon event after PPH. Early stenosis will occur within the first four months after surgery. The majority of the stenosis can be cured through colonoscopy surgery. The predictive factors for stenosis are previous sclerosis therapy for hemorrhoids and severe postoperative pain.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第13期897-899,共3页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 手术后并发症 直肠 缩窄 病理性 Hemorrhoids Postoperative complications Rectum Constriction,pathologic
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1姚礼庆 唐竞 戈少云 等.经吻合器治疗重度痔疮[J].中国实用外科杂志,2001,38(4):342-342. 被引量:18
  • 2姚礼庆,钟芸诗.吻合器痔上黏膜钉合术[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(23):1497-1499. 被引量:35
  • 3Lehur PA,Gravie JF,Meurette G.Circular stapled anopexy for hemorrhoid-dal disease:results.Colorectal Disease,2001,3:374-379. 被引量:1
  • 4Garcea G,Sutton CD,Lloyd TD,et al.Management of benign rectal strictures.Dis Colon Rectum,2003,46:1451-1460. 被引量:1
  • 5姚礼庆,钟芸诗,孙益红,戈少云,刘厚宝,郑烈伟.吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术治疗重度痔疮的3年疗效评价[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2004,7(2):120-123. 被引量:98
  • 6Milsom JW,Mazier WP.Classification and management of postsurgical anal stenosis.Surg Gynecol Obstet,1986,163:60-64. 被引量:1
  • 7Correa-Rovelo JM,Tellez O,Obregon L,et al.Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs.closed hemorrhoidectomy:a randomized,clinical trial.Dis Colon Rectum,2002,45:1367-1374. 被引量:1
  • 8Rowsell M,Bello M,Hemingway DM.Pain after stapled haemorrhoid-ectomy.Lancet,2000,356:2188. 被引量:1
  • 9Shalaby R,Desoky A.Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.Br J Surg,2001,88:1049-1053. 被引量:1
  • 10Hetzer FH,Demartines N,Handschin AE,et al.Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy:long-term results of a prospective randomized trial.Arch Surg,2002,137:337-340. 被引量:1

二级参考文献25

  • 1姚礼庆 唐竞 戈少云 等.经吻合器治疗重度痔疮[J].中国实用外科杂志,2001,38(4):342-342. 被引量:18
  • 2Thompson WHF. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg, 1975, 62: 544. 被引量:1
  • 3Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, et al. Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am J Surg, 2001,182:64. 被引量:1
  • 4Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg, 2001, 88:669. 被引量:1
  • 5Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2000, 355(9206): 779. 被引量:1
  • 6Aumann G, Petersen S, Pollack T, et al. Severe intra-abdominal bleeding following stapled mucosectomy due to enterocele: report of a case. Tech Coloproctol,2004,8: 41-43. 被引量:1
  • 7Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum,2004,47:1824-1836. 被引量:1
  • 8Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, et al. A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg, 2002, 137:1395-1401. 被引量:1
  • 9Petersen S, Hellmich G, Schumann D, et al. Early rectal stenosis following stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids. BMC Surg, 2004, 4:6-11. 被引量:1
  • 10Ripetti V, Caricato M, Arullani A. Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerations. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 45:268-273. 被引量:1

共引文献166

同被引文献372

引证文献55

二级引证文献283

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部