Prof. Guang-Xian Xu, the Editor-in-Chief of Journal of the Chinese Society of Rare Earths （JCSRE, in Chinese） and Journal of Rare Earths （JRE, in English）, was a distinguished chemist and educator of China. He was...Prof. Guang-Xian Xu, the Editor-in-Chief of Journal of the Chinese Society of Rare Earths （JCSRE, in Chinese） and Journal of Rare Earths （JRE, in English）, was a distinguished chemist and educator of China. He was a respected presiding figure in the area of rare earth science in China, and an eminent pioneer in the realm of science, technology and industry of rare earths in the world.展开更多
Conficius’ Theories on Poetry and The Prologue To Mao Poetry are different in their ideas of application of poetry, which leads to their different fashions of analyzing poems. For one thing, the former analyzes poems...Conficius’ Theories on Poetry and The Prologue To Mao Poetry are different in their ideas of application of poetry, which leads to their different fashions of analyzing poems. For one thing, the former analyzes poems within poems, while the latter does beyond. For another, the former is an apparent fashion of handling the affection and aspiration in poems, while the latter is a hidden fashion. All the explainers of The Book of Songs have misread The Prologue To Mao Poetry that analyze poems beyond poems, and believed it explained poems within poems. This misreading has resulted in the debate on whether to honor The Prologue To Mao Poetry or abandon it in the learning history of The Book of Songs .展开更多
文摘Prof. Guang-Xian Xu, the Editor-in-Chief of Journal of the Chinese Society of Rare Earths （JCSRE, in Chinese） and Journal of Rare Earths （JRE, in English）, was a distinguished chemist and educator of China. He was a respected presiding figure in the area of rare earth science in China, and an eminent pioneer in the realm of science, technology and industry of rare earths in the world.
文摘Conficius’ Theories on Poetry and The Prologue To Mao Poetry are different in their ideas of application of poetry, which leads to their different fashions of analyzing poems. For one thing, the former analyzes poems within poems, while the latter does beyond. For another, the former is an apparent fashion of handling the affection and aspiration in poems, while the latter is a hidden fashion. All the explainers of The Book of Songs have misread The Prologue To Mao Poetry that analyze poems beyond poems, and believed it explained poems within poems. This misreading has resulted in the debate on whether to honor The Prologue To Mao Poetry or abandon it in the learning history of The Book of Songs .
