1.引言
Lakoff和Johnson合作出版了<我们赖以生存的隐喻>(1980)之后,于1999年又出版了另一本著作:<体验哲学--基于身体的心智及其对西方思想的挑战>(Philosophy in theFlesh--The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Weste...1.引言
Lakoff和Johnson合作出版了<我们赖以生存的隐喻>(1980)之后,于1999年又出版了另一本著作:<体验哲学--基于身体的心智及其对西方思想的挑战>(Philosophy in theFlesh--The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought,以下简称<体验哲学>).书中提出了一个全新的哲学理论:体验哲学,论述了体验哲学的三项基本原则:'心智的体验性'、'认知的无意识性'和'思维的隐喻性'(the embodied mind, the cognitive un-consciousness, the metaphorical thought),并认为认知语言学是以体验哲学为其哲学基础的1.展开更多
The concept of supervenience advanced by D.Davidson to expound his anomolas monism is used to present both the dependent and independent relation between mental and physical properties. In Concepts of Supervenience,J....The concept of supervenience advanced by D.Davidson to expound his anomolas monism is used to present both the dependent and independent relation between mental and physical properties. In Concepts of Supervenience,J.Kim claimed that there are three different concepts of supervenience:the weak,the strong and the global,and demonstrated that the strong supervenience is equivalent to the global one. One year later,J.Kim corrected an error in the earlier paper,and held that the strong supervenience is stronger than the global,and the weak is independent of the global. Based on a brief introduction about J.Kim’s theory of supervenience,this paper contends that J.Kim’s conclusion about the relationship between the weak supervenience and the global one is wrong,and corrects some improper points in his formulation of and arguments about the strong and weak supervenience.展开更多
文摘1.引言
Lakoff和Johnson合作出版了<我们赖以生存的隐喻>(1980)之后,于1999年又出版了另一本著作:<体验哲学--基于身体的心智及其对西方思想的挑战>(Philosophy in theFlesh--The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought,以下简称<体验哲学>).书中提出了一个全新的哲学理论:体验哲学,论述了体验哲学的三项基本原则:'心智的体验性'、'认知的无意识性'和'思维的隐喻性'(the embodied mind, the cognitive un-consciousness, the metaphorical thought),并认为认知语言学是以体验哲学为其哲学基础的1.
文摘The concept of supervenience advanced by D.Davidson to expound his anomolas monism is used to present both the dependent and independent relation between mental and physical properties. In Concepts of Supervenience,J.Kim claimed that there are three different concepts of supervenience:the weak,the strong and the global,and demonstrated that the strong supervenience is equivalent to the global one. One year later,J.Kim corrected an error in the earlier paper,and held that the strong supervenience is stronger than the global,and the weak is independent of the global. Based on a brief introduction about J.Kim’s theory of supervenience,this paper contends that J.Kim’s conclusion about the relationship between the weak supervenience and the global one is wrong,and corrects some improper points in his formulation of and arguments about the strong and weak supervenience.
