摘要
认罪认罚从宽制度正式确立于2018年,但新修订的刑事诉讼法也仅使用了第十五条条文以对认罪认罚从宽的基本概念及适用条件进行了明确说明,其中并没有针对其是否适用或适用其他的上诉制度作出规定。在被告人签署了认罪认罚具结书以后,如果完全限制被告人的上诉权,会使认罪认罚案件彻底沦为一审终审案件,这就相当于彻底阻断了被告人的救济渠道,这与当下所追求的公平公正的价值理念不相符,而且往往在实践中被告人上诉又会引起检察院抗诉的问题,又继续引起上诉不加刑问题的争议。如何既可以在实现提高诉讼效益的要求下,又充分落实保障犯罪嫌疑人的救济权利一直都是认罪认罚从宽制度中备受关注的问题。因此,此文致力于研究认罪认罚从宽制度背景下被告人的上诉权的所面临的争议问题并提出解决办法。
The system of leniency of guilty plea was formally established in 2018, but Article 15 of the newly revised Criminal Procedure Law only clarifies the basic concept and applicable conditions of leniency of guilty plea in the form of basic principles, and does not make other provisions on whether it is applicable or applicable to other appeal systems. After the defendant signs the plea statement, if the defendant’s right to appeal is completely restricted, the plea case will be completely reduced to the first instance and final case, which is equivalent to completely blocking the defendant’s relief channel, which is inconsistent with the value concept of fairness and justice pursued at present, and often in practice, the defendant’s appeal will cause the procuratorate to protest. It continues to cause controversy over the issue of no additional penalty on appeal. How to ensure the relief rights of criminal suspects under the requirement of improving litigation efficiency has always been a concern in the leniency system of guilty plea. Therefore, this paper is devoted to the study of the defendant’s appeal right under the background of leniency system and put forward solutions.
出处
《法学（汉斯）》
2023年第4期2922-2927,共6页
Open Journal of Legal Science
