期刊文献+

4种系统治疗史蒂文斯–约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的网状Meta分析

Network Meta-Analysis of 4 Systemic Treatments for Stevenson-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:运用网状Meta比较4种系统治疗和支持性治疗史蒂文斯–约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的疗效。方法:检索Pubmed、Embase和Cochrane数据库,时间设定为1994年至2019年7月。根据纳入排除标准完成文献筛选、数据提取及质量评价,使用R软件和STATA 14.0进行分析。结果:数据库共检索到12,278篇文章,最终纳入17篇文献,共541名患者。在减少完全再上皮化时间方面:环孢素优于激素,差异有统计学意义(P 【0.05)。SUCRA排序结果前三名依次为环孢素、IVIG联合激素、支持性治疗。在减少平均住院日方面:环孢素优于单用IVIG,结果有统计学意义(P 【0.05)。SUCRA排序结果前三名依次为环孢素、IVIG联合激素、支持性治疗。结论:本次网状Meta分析结果为临床应用环孢素治疗SJS/TEN提供了依据。 Objective: A network meta-analysis was used to compare the efficacy of four systemic and support-ive treatments for Stevenson-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Methods: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases were retrieved from 1994 to July 2019. Literature screening, data extraction and quality evaluation were completed according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and R software and STATA 14.0 were used for analysis. A total of 12,278 articles were retrieved from the database and 17 articles were eventually included, totaling 541 patients. In terms of reducing the time of complete reepithelialization, cyclosporine was superior to glucocorticoid, and the difference was statistically significant (P
出处 《临床医学进展》 2020年第5期683-693,共11页 Advances in Clinical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1Shea BJ,Grimshaw JM,Wells GA,et al. Development of AMSTAR:a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2007,7:10. 被引量:1
  • 2Oxman AD,Guyatt GH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1991, 44(11):1271-8. 被引量:1
  • 3Oxman AD. Checklists for review articles [J]. BMJ,1994, 309(6955):648-51. 被引量:1
  • 4Sacks HS,Berrier J,Reitman D,et al. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials[J]. N Engl J Med, 1987, 316(8):450-5. 被引量:1
  • 5Shea BJ,Bouter LM,Peterson J,et al. External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR)[J]. PLoS One, 2007, 2(12):e1350. 被引量:1
  • 6CASP(Critical Skills Appraisal Programme)[EB/OL]. [2012-12-01]. http://www.easp-uk.net/wp-eontent/uploads/2011/11/CASP_System atie_Review_Appraisal_Cheeklist_14oct_10.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 7Egger M,Smith GD,Ahman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: Meta-analysis in context[M]. 2nd edition. London: BMJ Publishing Group, BMA House, Tavistock Square, WCIH 9JR, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 8Cornell JE,Laine C. The science and art of deduction: complex systematic overviews [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2008, 148(10):786-8. 被引量:1
  • 9曾宪涛,包翠萍,曹世义,刘菊英.Meta分析系列之三:随机对照试验的质量评价工具[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2012,4(3):183-185. 被引量:244
  • 10曾宪涛,刘慧,陈曦,冷卫东.Meta分析系列之四:观察性研究的质量评价工具[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2012,4(4):297-299. 被引量:946

共引文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部