期刊文献+

国家医保药物目录遴选的临床证据支持:以甲类抗高血压药物为例 被引量:5

Supporting clinical evidence for national medical insurance drug list selection: A case of antihypertensive drugs of class A
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:以甲类抗高血压药物为例,了解我国在国家医保药物目录遴选方面的临床证据支持现状,为建立完善的动态药物目录提供依据。方法:以美国和英国的高血压指南、WHO的基本药物目录以及我国在药物开展方面的系统评价或者Meta分析作为我国医保药物遴选的临床证据支持依据。结果:在2009版的国家医保药物目录中,总共有17种甲类抗高血压药物,其中11种甲类抗高血压药物有充分的临床证据支持依据,其它6种缺乏相应的证据支持。结论:部分国家医保药物目录中的甲类抗高血压药物的遴选尚缺乏相应的临床证据支持,应对那些证据力度不高、缺乏证据级别的药物进行相应的评价和更新,从而建立和完善适合我国用药国情、具有较高证据支持的动态医保药物目录机制。 Objectives:To understand the current state of supporting clinical evidence for the drugs on the national medical insurance drugs list.Methods:With the example of antihypertensive drugs of class A,evidence-based recommendations of the US,UK,and WHO were adopted and the meta-analysis or systematic reviews published in Chinese journals were referred to.Results:11 antihypertensive drugs of class A were included in the national medical insurance drugs list with supporting clinical evidence.The other 6 antihypertensive drugs of class A lacked sufficient supporting clinical evidence.Conclusions:several antihypertensive drugs of class A are included in the national medical insurance drugs list without supporting clinical evidence.More reseach is needed to establish a dynamical medical insurance list system that is evidence-based.
出处 《中国卫生政策研究》 CSCD 2014年第8期24-28,共5页 Chinese Journal of Health Policy
基金 中华医学基金会(CMB)资助课题(11-067)
关键词 国家医保药物目录 甲类抗高血压药物 临床证据 National medical insurance drugs list Antihypertensive drugs of class A Clinical evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献210

共引文献7391

同被引文献42

  • 1耿介立,俞羚,孙亚蒙,宋叶平,曹雯炜,杨晓岚,杨立刚,林岩,潘元美,糜建华,苏爱萍,董荃,邹静,陈莺,高枚春,李焰生.急性缺血性卒中患者早期处理指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会的健康职业者指南[J].神经病学与神经康复学杂志,2013,10(1):33-80. 被引量:129
  • 2冯芮华,王增武,崔月颖,王馨,王小万.社区高血压患者抗高血压药物治疗费用的影响因素[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2015,40(3):291-297. 被引量:22
  • 3袁恒杰,陈大为,范立君.尼群地平多晶型化学稳定性影响因素考察[J].中国医院药学杂志,2004,24(11):691-693. 被引量:6
  • 4Yost J,Dobbins M,Traynor R,et al.Tools to support evidence-informed public health decision making[J].BMC Public Health,2014,14(1):1-13. 被引量:1
  • 5Smith J C,Medalia C.Health Insurance Coverage in the United States:2013[M].Washington D C:U.S.Government Printing Office,2014:2-3. 被引量:1
  • 6Busse R,Blümel M.Germany:Health system review[R].Copenhagen:World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe,2014. 被引量:1
  • 7One Hundred Eleventh Congress of the United States of America.The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Sec.4105):Evidence-based coverage of preventive services in Medicare[M].Washington D C:U.S.Department of Health & Human Services,2010:440. 被引量:1
  • 8Mauskopf J,Chirila C,Birt J,et al.Drug reimbursement recommendations by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence:have they impacted the National Health Service budget?〖KG-*2〗[J].Health Policy,2013,110(1):49-59. 被引量:1
  • 9Gomes T,Martins D,Cheng L,et al.The impact of policies to reduce blood glucose test strip utilization and costs in Canada[J].Can J Public Health,2015,106(4):e210-e216. 被引量:1
  • 10Hrn H,Nink K,McGauran N,et al.Early benefit assessment of new drugs in Germany-results from 2011 to 2012[J].Health Policy,2014,116(2-3):147-153. 被引量:1

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部