摘要
目前美国产品责任并存着疏忽责任、担保责任和严格责任三种归责原则 ,而我国在面向消费者的归责原则上实行的是严格责任。此外 ,我国的过错责任、瑕疵担保责任与美国的疏忽责任、担保责任的含义和适用上都有很大差别。法律实质上是在对效益与正义的考量中不断发展的 ,本文在对中美产品责任归责原则的比较研究的基础上 ,揭示了造成这种差异的内在原因是政治、经济、法哲学思潮等多种因素的相互作用和影响 ,而这一切归根结底是各种利益博奕的结果 。
At present in the U.S.A. there exist three doctrines of liability fixation: negligent liability, guarantee liability and strict liability. In China actually adopts strict liability for responsibility of consumers. In addition, there exist a great difference between the tort liability, liability for warrant of defects in China and the negligent liability in the U.S.A. in view of conception and applicability. Law in effect is constantly developing in the process of balancing the relationship between efficiency and justice. The thesis, being on the basis of comparative study of the Sino-US doctrine of liability of fixation, reveals the inherent cause of discrepancy, which affects each other in various factors politically, economically and philosophically all of the above-mentioned is actually the result of gambling for various interests. Thus the author comes up with some propositions concerning how to balance the interrelationship of the relevant legislation in terms of dialectical materialism.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第2期175-180,共6页
Modern Law Science
关键词
产品责任
归责原则
中国
美国
严格责任
效益
担保责任
product liability
doctrine of liability of fixation
strict liability
interest
justice
