摘要
分析哲学是有其人文和社会的兴趣与关怀的。本文试图从批判理论的视角,运用哲学与生活世界相关联的解释学方法,分别解读了分析哲学创始人之一的罗素的逻辑分析哲学与他作为一个哲学家的社会批判兴趣之间的关系,以及前期维特根斯坦的逻辑语言分析哲学和后期的日常语言分析哲学与维特根斯坦所属的生活世界的关系。指出分析哲学由于没有建立在对现代性的科学-形而上学思维方式和生活方式的足够反思基础上,所以它对形而上学的批判兴趣最终仍然导致了一种非批判的形而上学。
Analytic philosophy has its humanistic and social interest and care. This paper tries to analyze the relationship between the analytic philosophy of Russell and the interest of social critique of Russell as a philosopher, and the relationship between the philosophy of earlier and later Wittgenstein and his lifeworld. As a conclusion, this study points out that the critical interest of analytic philosophy toward metaphysics has led to a non - critical metaphysics, because it has no enough critical reflection on modernistic scientific - metaphysical ways of thinking and life.
出处
《现代哲学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第2期90-96,共7页
Modern Philosophy
关键词
生活世界
兴趣
分析
批判
哲学问题
Lifeworld
Interest
Analysis
Critique
Philosophical Problem
