摘要
互联网企业的平台开放为互联网行业带来了新的契机。网络平台服务提供者通过开放自身接口,与第三方程序应用开发者实现互惠互利。长尾理论下,互联网开放平台服务提供者的责任认定有重要意义。2013年,我国颁布了一系列法律法规以期能够促进网络的健康发展,但由于开放平台的复杂性和多样化,现行的认定机制仍然存在很多疏漏,没有很好地解决互联网开放平台提供商责任认定的问题。本文借鉴发达国家的经验,从细化教唆侵权与代位侵权类型,适用技术中立明确其法律地位,明确避风港原则的判定步骤,以及利用汉德公式进行司法判定四个方面来解决该责任认定问题。
It’s a opportunity for ISPs to develop themselves in opening environment. The opening platform achieves a mutual benefit with the third APP developers through the opening API. In the context of the protection of IP and the theory of long tail,it is important to study how to identify the liability for infringement of ISP. In order to promote the development of Internet,our country issued several regulations in 2003. There are still lots of oversight in affirming the liability of ISP owing to the complexity and diversification of network. Therefore,it is necessary for us to refer to the developed country to design a reasonable system.
出处
《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》
2013年第6期150-155,130,共7页
Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
基金
2013年中南财经政法大学研究生教育基金“互联网开放平台的版权保护——基于腾讯开放平台的实证研究”(项目编号:2013S1301)
关键词
间接侵权
教唆侵权
代位侵权
技术中立
避风港规则
Indirect Infringement
Vicarious Infringement
Contributory Infringement
Technology Neutral
Safe Harbor Rule
