摘要
宪法与民法的关系是个兼具理论与实践意义的重要问题,正确理解这个问题有赖于二者法律位阶关系的澄清。理论界在讨论其法阶关系时,往往涉及两个焦点语词:"根本法"与"母法",并将二者所属主体混同,造成认识上的困难。其实"根本法"和"母法"考查问题的角度是不同的,前者是从横向的效力等级,后者是从纵向的历史起源视角考查的,而两者都是法律位阶的应有之义,所以,将二者所属主体适当分离,即认为在历史起源视角上,民法是"母法";在效力等级视角上,宪法是"根本法"。这样可以对二者的关系做出客观和理性的解读。
The relationships between the Constitution and Civil Law is an important issue both to theoretical and practical significance. The key to correct understanding of this issue is to clarify the legal hierarchy between them. When talking about the legal hierarchy between the Constitution and Civil Law, the academic circle often focus on two words:"fundamental law" and"parent law", and confuse their subjects. In fact, they discuss this issue from different perspectives. The former from the force grade, and later is from the historical origin, and both are the meanings of legal hierarchy. Therefore, it is objective and rational to separate their subjects(for the force grade, the Constitution is"fundamental law", for the historical origin, Civil Law is"parent law")
出处
《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》
2008年第4期113-118,共6页
Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
关键词
宪法与民法的关系
法律位阶
根本法
母法
Relationship between the Constitution and Civil Law
Legal Hierarchy
Fundamental Law
Parent Law
