摘要
我国宪法理论与实践将宪法性法律作为仅次于宪法典的重要宪法渊源。但宪法性法律的表述具有一定的误导性,有必要在观念溯源的基础上予以辨析和反思。“宪法性”作为形容词与“法律”作为名词相结合的复合结构具有悠久历史。宪法(πολιτετα)一语的民族语言化构成其基本前提,根本法(lois fondamentales)等概念是其直接萌芽。随着古代不成文宪法自近代以来逐渐成文化,根本法等概念基本上被成文宪法典取代。在现代成文宪法体系中,宪法性法律无论作为对宪法典的修订,还是在宪法典缺失时作为替补法典的复数成文宪法文件,都具有与宪法典相同的规范效力。立法机关基于宪法典制定的实施性法律不构成宪法渊源,应以宪法附属法或其他适当表述来统称其类别并确保其合宪性。
The theory and practice of constitutional law take constitutional laws as its second important source.However,the expression of constitutional law itself is misleading,so it is necessary to analyze its concept on the basis of tracing its theoretical source.The compound structure of“constitutional”as an adjective and“law”as a noun has a long history.The nationalized language of“πoλιτετα”i constitutes its basic premise,.and the concepts such as lois fondamentales are its direct germination.As the ancient unwritten constitution has gradually become written constitution since modern times,the concepts of fundamental law have basically been replaced by the written constitutional code.In modern written constitution system,constitutional laws are mainly used as revisions to the constitutional code.When the constitutional code is missing,they are used as written constitutional documents of plurality to replace the code,but they all have the same normative effect as the constitutional code.The implementing laws formulated by the legislature based on the constitutional code do not constitute the source of the.constitution.They should be collectively referred to as their categories in laws affiliated to the Constitution or other appropriate expressions and ensure their constitutionality.
出处
《厦门大学法律评论》
2022年第2期1-18,共18页
Xiamen University Law Review
基金
2018年度教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“加强宪法实施、教育和监督研究”(批准号:18JZ036)阶段性研究成果
关键词
宪法渊源
宪法规范
宪法性法律
宪法典
宪法修改
宪法审查
constitutional source
constitutional norm
constitutional law
constitution
constitutional revision
constitutional review
