期刊文献+

基于演化博弈视角下企业工资集体协商机制的研究 被引量:2

Evolutionary Game Analysis on Collective Wage Consultation System of Enterprises
原文传递
导出
摘要 工资集体协商是一个企业与劳动者之间进行利益博弈的过程,对于协调劳动关系、实现劳资双赢具有重要意义。本文通过构建企业工资集体协商的演化博弈模型,通过局部稳定分析及绘制系统相图,分析了劳动者与企业的复动制态和演化稳定策略,揭示了工资协商中的演化进程。研究表明:当劳动者以较高的概率选择引发冲突策略时,企业趋向于选择增加工资策略;反之,则不太可能满足劳动者要求;劳动者在理性前提下,只要冲突的收益大于成本,都将趋近于选择引发冲突策略。基于此,本文从法律条规和主体意识方面,提出了在现有格局下保护劳动者权益的对策建议。 Collective wage consultation is a gambling process between laborers and the enterprise,which is crucial to coordinate labor relations and realize a win- win situation.By building evolutionary game model of the two groups,the replicated dynamics and evolutionary stable strategy(ESS) are analyzed.The results are;the enterprises would choose the 'increasing wage quantity' strategy when labors are very likely to choose the 'triggering conflicts',otherwise they are less likely to do it.When the earnings of leading to conflict outweigh the costs,the laborers would choose the 'triggering conflicts'.Finally,from the view of legal regulation and subject consciousness,some proposals for protecting the laborers' rights are put forward.
作者 陈珍 费军
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第S1期1-7,共7页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
关键词 工资集体协商 演化博弈 稳定分析 collective wage consultation evolutionary game stability analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献41

共引文献166

同被引文献22

  • 1浦徐进,吴亚,路璐,蒋力.企业生产行为和官员监管行为的演化博弈模型及仿真分析[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(S1):390-396. 被引量:51
  • 2Takehiro INOHARA,Keith W. HIPEL,Sean WALKER.CONFLICT ANALYSIS APPROACHES FOR INVESTIGATING ATTITUDES AND MISPERCEPTIONS IN THE WAR OF 1812[J].Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering,2007,16(2):181-201. 被引量:29
  • 3Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. The theory of games and economic behavior[M~. Princeton, New Jersey: Prin- ceton University Press, 1944. 被引量:1
  • 4Howard N. Paradoxes of rationality: Theory of met- agames and political behavior l- M1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1971. 被引量:1
  • 5Kilgour D M, Hipel K W, Fang Liping. The graph model for conflicts[J]. Automatica, 1987, 23(1): 41- 55. 被引量:1
  • 6Fang Liping, Hipel K W, Kigour D M. A decision sup- port system for interactive decision making: The graph model for conflict resolutionEM~. New York: Wiley, 1993. 被引量:1
  • 7Getirana A, Malta V D. Decision process in a water use conflict in brazil E J 1. Water Resources Management, 2008, 22(1): 103-118. 被引量:1
  • 8Hipel K W, Walker S B. Conflict analysis in environ- men- tal management[J]. Environmetrics, 2011, 22(5): 279-293. 被引量:1
  • 9Hamouda L, Kilgour D M, Hipel K W. Strength of preference in the graph model for conflict resolution [J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2004, 13 (5) : 449-462. 被引量:1
  • 10Hamouda L, Kilgour D M, Hipel K W. Strength of preference in graph models for multiple-decision-makerconflicts [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006, 179(1): 314-327. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部