摘要
根据有关法律规定,刑法司法解释的主体为最高人民法院和最高人民检察院,但实际上有诸多不具备刑法司法解释主体资格者参与刑法司法解释。理论上关于刑法司法解释主体存在不同认识。本文认为,可以从应然和实然两个不同的视角,以及刑法司法解释是否具有规范性等,将刑法司法解释主体分为刑法司法解释的实然主体与应然主体以及规范性刑法司法解释主体与个案刑法司法解释主体。
According to relevant legal stipulation, only the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate have the power of the judicial explanation of criminal law.But as the matter of fact, there are many administrative organizations who have not such a power participate in the judicial explanation of criminal law. Theoretically,different ideas exist about the judicial explanation of criminal law.This paper thinks , according to what should be or what exists, as well as whether the judicial explanation of criminal law hassole standard, the judicial explanation of criminal law can be divided into the should-be explanation and the existing explanation, as well as the standard explanation and case judicial explanation of criminal law main part.
出处
《河南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2004年第1期74-77,共4页
Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
刑法解释
司法解释
解释主体
Criminal explanation
judicial explanation
subject of explanation
