期刊文献+

反事实思维与因果推理的关系 被引量:8

The Relation between Counterfactual Thinking and Causal Reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 反事实思维是人们日常生活中经常产生的一种思维方式 ,这种思维常常影响因果推理和归因。国外许多研究者对他们的关系以及影响因素和机制进行了研究。该文对这些研究成果与分歧进行综述 。 Counterfactual thinking is a way of thinking in our everyday life, which influen ce causal reasoning and attribution. A lot of researcher explored the relation a nd mechanism between counterfactual and causal reasoning. The essay will introdu ce their investigation results and disagreement, and some questions have been pu t forward to be studied further.
出处 《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》 2004年第1期95-98,共4页 Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目 (批准号 :30 2 70 4 76 ) .
关键词 反事实思维 因果推理 归因 counterfactual thinking causal reasoning attrib ution
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[1]Kahneman D.T. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its iternatives[J]. Psychological Review, 1986,93:136-153. 被引量:1
  • 2[2]N'gbala, A., & Branscombe, N. R. Mental simulation and causal attribution. When simulationg an event does not affect fault assignment[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1995,31:139-162. 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Markman K D,Gavanski I, Sheman S J, McMullen M N. The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1993,29:87-109. 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Gavanski, .E., & Wells, G. L. Counterfactual processing of normal and exceptional events[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychomogy.1989,25:314-325. 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Gilovich V.Legrenzi P, Rizzo A. Event controllability in counterfactual thinking[J]. Acta Psychologica ,1991,78:111-133. 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Kahneman & Tversky, A. The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovei, & A., Tversky(Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases[M].1982,201-208. New York: Cambridge University Press. 被引量:1
  • 7[7]Gavanski, .E., & Wells, G. L. Counterfactual processing of normal and exceptional events[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.1989,25:314-325. 被引量:1
  • 8[8]Lipe.M,G. Counterfactual Reasoning as a framework for attribution theories. Psychological Bulletin,1991,109(3): 456-471. 被引量:1
  • 9[9]Einhorn,H.J., Hogarth,R.M. Judging probable cause[J]. Psychological Bulletin,1986,99:3-19. 被引量:1
  • 10[10]Kelley,H.H. the processes of causal attribution[J]. American psychologist,1973,28:107-128. 被引量:1

同被引文献71

引证文献8

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部