期刊文献+

辽西油松林水土保持效益评价 被引量:7

Assessment of ecological benefits of Chinese pine in soil and water conservation forests in Western Liaoning Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用 1 0 1块样地的调查资料 ,采用综合因子评价方法评价了辽西油松水土保持林的生态效益 ,把辽西油松水土保持林划分为低效、较低效、中效、较高效、高效五个等级 :其中牛河梁地区的油松人工林大都为低效林 ,欺天林场的油松人工林大都为中效林 ,南刘杖子林场的天然次生林大都为高效林。这一研究结果将为辽西油松水土保持林生态系统管理提供重要的科学依据。 In this paper, the ecological benefits of Soil and Water Conservation Forests planted with Chinese pine (Pinus tabulaeformis) were assessed for 101 plots in Western Liaoning Province by using the comprehensive-index assessment method. The comprehensive-index assessment method is an indirect but effective method used for estimation, especially when the main functional indices are difficult to measure. In order to use this method, a system of estimation indices assessing the ecological benefits of forests was designed for Western Liaoning, including estimation criteria and classification of benefits. The types of forest ecological benefits were classified based on the weight value of every index (by Analytic Hierarchy Process, i.e. AHP) and the comprehensive estimate index (from the survey materials of forest stands).The Soil and Water Conservation Forests of Western Liaoning Province were divided into five classes using the comprehensive-index assessment method: lower-benefit forest, low-benefit forest, middle-benefit forest, high-benefit forest and higher-benefit forest. Most forests of the Niuheliang, Qitian, and Nanliuzhangzi regions were classified as low-benefit, middle-benefit, and high-benefit forests respectively. In Niuheliang region, lower-benefit, low-benefit and middle-benefit forests accounted for 79.4%, 14.7% and 5.9% respectively. In Qitian region, lower-benefit forest, low-benefit and middle-benefit forests were 4.5%, 22.7%, 72.7% respectively. In Nanliuzhangzi region, high-benefit and higher benefit forests were 16.7% and 83.3% respectively. The results showed that forest structural integrity (especially the forests' layer structure) has a great significance in the ability of Soil and Water Conservation Forests to provide ecosystem services. In particular, a key task for ecosystem management in these pine forests is the conservation of the herbage layer and the litter layer on the forest floor. The policy of forest protection should be adopted as an effective approach for ecosystem management in S
出处 《生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第12期2531-2539,共9页 Acta Ecologica Sinica
基金 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向资助项目 (KZCX3 -SW-48) 国家"九五"重点科技攻关资助项目 (96-0 0 7-0 1 -0 6)~~
关键词 水土保持 水土保持林 效益评价 低效林 油松林 辽宁西部 soil and water conservation soil and water conservation forest benefit assessment low-benefit forest Chinese pine Western Liaoning Province
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1严星,林增杰主编..城市地产评估 下[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1993:369.
  • 2孙立达,朱金兆主编..水土保持林体系综合效益研究与评价[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1995:468.
  • 3徐化成主编..油松[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1993:480.
  • 4甘应爱.运筹学[M].清华大学出版社,1990,3.. 被引量:26
  • 5沈慧,姜凤岐.水土保持林效益评价研究综述[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(4):492-496. 被引量:28
  • 6程根伟,钟祥浩.防护林生态效益定量指标体系研究[J].水土保持学报,1992,6(3):79-86. 被引量:30
  • 7宋兆民主编..黄淮海平原综合防护林体系生态经济效益的研究[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1990:260.
  • 8徐孝庆.森林综合效益计量评价[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1992.. 被引量:7
  • 9倪绍祥..土地类型与土地评价概论[M],1999.
  • 10赵焕臣著..层次分析法[M].北京:科学出版社,1986.

二级参考文献83

共引文献3054

同被引文献72

引证文献7

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部