摘要
法兰克福学派理论家们都讨论过技术问题,但该学派一直以来对技术的批判并未真正切中肯綮,因为他们没有正视过技术问题的核心即媒介技术。本研究试图从不同于普通技术哲学的媒介技术哲学视角出发,反思马尔库塞和哈贝马斯关于'科技作为意识形态'命题的缺陷:哈贝马斯简单化地认为技术只是工具理性世界中的事,因此以技术和交往对立为前提所构想的交往行动理论和公共领域都过于理性主义,放弃媒介技术考量的交往行动理论注定是一个乌托邦;马尔库塞关于技术意识形态性的批判虽然比哈贝马斯更为彻底,但是他只停留于技术的政治批判逻辑中打转,似乎还缺乏更进一步的毅力,没有深入关切作为技术与意识形态结盟的最直接和最主要形式的媒介技术是如何在日常生活实践中宰制行动者的时间和空间观念的。最后指出媒介技术哲学的传播学视角的超越性,传播之于行动者,其实就是媒介技术之于主体意识。
Most theorists of Frankfurt school have discussed technical issues,but the school’s long-standing critique of technology has not really cut in the key problem,because they have not faced up to the core of technical issues,media technology.This study attempts to reflect on the shortcomings of Marcuse and Habermas about the proposition of'science and technology as an ideology'from the perspective of the philosophy of media technology which is different from the general philosophy of technology.On one hand,Habermas simplistically believed that technology is only in the world of instrumental rationality.Therefore,the communicative action theory and the public sphere conceived on the premise of binary opposition between technology and communication are too rational.The theory of communicative action that abandons media technology is destined to be a utopia.On the other hand,although Marcuse’s critique of technical ideology was more thorough than Habermas’s,he trapped in the political critique of technology.As a result,there is no deep concern about how media technology which is the most direct and dominant form of an alliance of technology and ideology is dominating the actors’time and space concepts in the practice of daily life.Finally,this study points out that the communication technology perspective of media technology philosophy has its transcendence:the dissemination to the actors,what is the media technology to the subject consciousness.
作者
高艺
王金礼
Gao Yi;Wang Jinli
出处
《新闻春秋》
2019年第3期72-81,共10页
Journalism Evolution
关键词
媒介技术
意识形态
合理性
技术兴趣
交往兴趣
media technology
ideolog
rationality
technical interest
communication interest
