期刊文献+

CEO权力强度、过度自信与财务报告舞弊 被引量:20

CEO Power,Overconfidence and Financial Reporting Fraud
原文传递
导出
摘要 选取2006—2015年因财务报告舞弊而受到处罚的非金融类A股上市公司作为舞弊样本,根据年度、行业及公司规模等标准选取非舞弊样本进行配对,实证检验了在过度自信心理和产权性质的影响下,CEO权力强度对上市公司财务报告舞弊的影响。研究发现:CEO权力强度与公司财务报告舞弊倾向显著正相关;而CEO的过度自信心理更助推了CEO权利强度对财务报告舞弊倾向的影响。进一步,在国有企业性质的情况下,CEO权利强度与财务报告舞弊倾向的正相关关系会被强化。本文的研究结果为上市公司财务报告舞弊提供新的研究视角,丰富公司治理与财务报告舞弊相关研究的文献与经验证据。 Selecting the non-financial A-share listed companies which were punished for financial reporting fraud from 2006 to 2015as the fraud sample and matching the fraud sample according to criteria such as year,industry and company size,this thesis studied the impact of CEO power on financial reporting fraud under the influence of overconfidence and nature of property rights,which took both inner psychological factors and external power characteristics of CEOs into account.This thesis draws the following conclusions after research:the larger CEO power is,the greater the possibility of financial reporting fraud in listed companies is;overconfidence significantly strengthens the positive correlation between CEO power and the possibility of financial reporting fraud in listed companies;furthermore,the positive impact of CEO power on financial reporting fraud in stateowned listed companies is significantly higher than that in non-state-owned listed companies.The results of this study provide a new perspective for financial reporting fraud of listed companies.Moreover,this study enriches the literature and empirical evidence of corporate governance and financial reporting fraud.
出处 《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第10期78-89,共12页 Modern Finance and Economics:Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(15BGL055)
关键词 CEO权力强度 过度自信 产权性质 财务报告舞弊 CEO power overconfidence nature of property rights financial reporting fraud
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

二级参考文献469

共引文献4793

同被引文献290

引证文献20

二级引证文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部