摘要
面对国际法上缺乏统一明确的证明标准的现实,通过对国际法院判例的实证分析,发现国际法院在很大程度上借鉴了普通法系的证据标准体系,并通过对相同类型和性质的案件进行比较,发现同类案件采取的证明标准具有很大程度的一致性。据此,结合网络攻击构成国际不法行为可能的属性,并考虑到网络攻击自身的特殊性,试图初步回答网络攻击国家责任判定中证明标准的合理界定问题。
In the face of a lack of unified and clear standard of proof in international law,this article is making an empirical analysis of the case jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice,realizing that the ICJ draws lessons from the common law system of evidential standards to a great extent. Therefore,by comparing cases of the same type and nature,this article finds out that despite some inconsistencies and defaults,there is general regularity regarding standard of proof among cases of the same nature. On such basis,combining the internationally wrongful acts with cyber attacks,and considering the particularity of cyber attacks,this article is trying to provide a preliminary assessment of the reasonable standard of proof in state responsibility of cyber attacks.
出处
《武大国际法评论》
2017年第5期38-53,共16页
Wuhan University International Law Review
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"中国参与网络空间国际规则制定研究"(项目批准号:16ZDA074)的阶段性成果
关键词
网络攻击
国家责任
证明标准
排除合理怀疑
明确而令人信服
cyber attack
state responsibility
standard of proof
beyond reasonable doubt
clear and convincing
