摘要
"保护的责任"设定了主权国家和国际社会这两类责任主体,就国际社会而言,"保护的责任"所提出的补充责任要求缺乏既有国际法规范的效力支撑,因而不能成为具有明确约束力的法律义务。由于受到各种因素的限制、约束,补充保护责任没有成为也不可能趋向于习惯国际法义务。在目前的条件下,国际社会所承担的补充保护责任应当是一种特殊的政治、道义上的义务。对于是否以及如何实施干预保护,政治、道义责任为国际社会及其成员提供了自由裁量的开放空间。但这同时造成了补充保护责任被不当履行甚至被滥用的可能。为此,应在国际社会注重讨论、形成和完善各种相关的约束规范与机制,尤其是在非武力强制干预措施和武力干预措施方面。
The subject of 'Responsibility to Protect'has been classified into sovereign state and international community. As far as international community is concerned,the complemental responsibility demanded by 'Responsibility to Protect'lacks force support of existing international law,so it has not become legal obligation which has manifest binding force. Because of restriction of various factors,the complemental responsibility to protect has not become and impossibly tends to be obligation of customary international law. In the current circumstance,the complemental responsibility to protect is just a special obligation at the political and moral level. For whether or not and how to intervene for protection,political and moral obligation provide open room for international community and its members,but which simultaneously result in possibility that the complemental responsibility to protect may be improperly implemented and even abused. Thus,the norms and mechanisms on restriction and regulation should be specially discussed,established and perfected by international community,especially in the aspect of non-force coercive measure and force intervention measure.
出处
《武大国际法评论》
2017年第2期1-17,共17页
Wuhan University International Law Review
基金
2010年国家社科基金年度一般项目"我国政府参与全球性治理若干法律问题研究"(项目号:10BFX098)的阶段性成果之一
关键词
“保护的责任”
强制措施
人权
补充保护责任
约束规制
responsibility to protect
coercive measure
human rights
complemental responsibility to protect
restriction and regulation
