期刊文献+

论人权条约监督机制的趋同化 被引量:2

On the Convergence of the Human Rights Treaty Monitoring Mechanisms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人权条约实施的内在约束力更多地依赖于人类社会公共道德和良知,其吸引力明显低于那些实际利益。更为重要的是,人权条约的种类繁多,各人权条约往往按照自身的条约规定独立设置相应的监督机制,因而各监督机制之间表现出歧异化的一面,为人权标准的统一实施增添了难度。但是,另一方面,人权条约的共同内涵为各人权条约机构寻求共同的实施方式奠定了基础。在人权条约的渐进发展过程中,各人权条约机构纷纷遵循和模仿其他人权条约机构的最佳实践。在联合国的组织和推动下,人权条约机构之间相互协调以提高人权条约实施的效率。人权条约监督机构的设置、监督程序的种类以及监督机构的实践已然呈现出趋同化的发展态势。 The inherent binding force of human rights treaty depends on public morality and conscience of the human society.The attractiveness is significantly lower than that of the actual interests.More importantly,there is a wide range of human rights treaties,which often require independent set of monitoring mechanisms in accordance with their own treaty.There appears to be discrepancy between monitoring mechanisms,which makes the unified implementation of human rights protection more difficult.However,on the other hand,the common connotation of the human rights treaty laid the foundation for the human rights bodies to seek common embodiment.In the process of the progressive development of human rights treaties,human rights bodies tend to follow and imitate the best practices of other bodies.With the organizations and promotion of the United Nations, the human rights bodies coordinate their activities with each other in order to improve the efficiency of human rights bodies.There has been a trend towards convergence of the setting of the human rights treaty bodies,types of monitoring procedures and monitoring bodies practice.
作者 徐鹏
出处 《武大国际法评论》 CSSCI 2012年第2期132-152,共21页 Wuhan University International Law Review
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“21世纪国际人权条约的实施与中国的改革与对应”(12JJD820017)的阶段性成果
关键词 人权条约 国际人权机构 人权条约监督机制 趋同化 Human Rights Treaties International Human Rights Bodies Human Rights Treaty Monitoring Mechanisms Convergence
  • 相关文献

同被引文献72

  • 1余民才.国家责任法的性质[J].法学家,2005(4):132-140. 被引量:8
  • 2张翔.基本权利的受益权功能与国家的给付义务——从基本权利分析框架的革新开始[J].中国法学,2006(1):21-36. 被引量:231
  • 3Sigrun Skogly and Mark Gibney, "Transnational Human Rights Obligations", Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 3 (2002), pp. 782 -783. 被引量:1
  • 4Gerald L. Neuman, "Extraterritorial Rights and Constitutional Methodology after Rasul v. Bush", University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 153, No. 6 (2005), p. 2073 . 被引量:1
  • 5Galia Rivlin, "Constitutions Beyond Borders : The Overlooked Practical Aspects of the Extraterritorial Ques- tion", Boston University International Law Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1 (2012), p. 135. 被引量:1
  • 6Dominic McGoldrick, "Extraterritorial Application of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights'", in lons Coomans and Menno Kamminga ( eds), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties, Antwerp- Oxford : Intersentia, 2004 . 被引量:1
  • 7Michal Gondek, The Reach of Human Rights in a Globalising World: Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties, Antwerp-Portland: Intersentia, 2009. 被引量:1
  • 8Beth Van Schaack, "The United States' Position on the Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Obligations: Now is the Time for Change", International Law Studies, Vol. 90, No. 1 (2014), pp. 31-47. 被引量:1
  • 9The European Court of Human Rights, A1-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom, Judgment of 7 July 2011, paras. 130-140. 被引量:1
  • 10The European Court of Human Rights, Jaloud v. The Netherlands, Judgment of 20 November 2014, para. 139. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部