期刊文献+

经桡动脉与股动脉入径直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死的对比研究 被引量:54

A comparative study on transradial vs transfemoral artery access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 对经桡动脉与股动脉入径直接经皮冠状动脉介入 (TRA pPCI与TFA pPCI)治疗急性心肌梗死 (AMI)的临床可行性、安全性及其疗效进行对比研究。方法  2 0 0 0年 9月至 2 0 0 2年 8月期间 ,2 0 8例 [男性 159例 ,女性 49例 ,平均年龄 (58 9± 11 9)岁 ]发病在 12h内的AMI患者 ,随机分为TRA pPCI组 10 6例 ,TFA pPCI组 10 2例。比较两种入径 pPCI各操作时程和疗效及术后出血、血栓 /栓塞和血管并发症 ;观察桡动脉痉挛发生率并评价药物预防和解痉效果。并随访比较TRA pPCI组术后 1个月双侧桡动脉内径和血流速度及桡动脉血管并发症。结果 TRA pPCI组和TFA pPCI组各 2例患者因入径血管困难而交叉调组。TRA pPCI组PCI处理病变血管 10 6支 ,其中完全闭塞病变 2 8支。TFA pPCI组PCI处理病变血管 10 2支 ,完全闭塞 3 4支。两组患者在桡 /股动脉穿刺时间、指引导管置入时间、病人到达医院至球囊开始扩张时间、总pPCI时程无明显差异 [(18 3± 3 3 )s比 (16 9± 4 2 )s ;(6 0± 1 6)min比 (5 8± 0 9)min ;(45 3± 19 6)min比 (42 8± 2 2 7)min ;(49 2± 2 4 1)min比 (46 5± 2 6 4)min ,P均 >0 0 5]。两组一次入径血管穿刺成功率、梗死相关动脉 (IRA)开通率和PCI成功率亦相似 (93 4%比 96 1% ;10 0 %比 Objective To compare the feasibility,safety with outcome of transradial artery with transfemoral artery access for primary percutaneous c oronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI) Methods Two hundred and eight patients with AMI episoded within 12 hours, male 159, female 49,age 58 9±11 9 (34-88) years, were randomly divided into transradial artery access for primary PCI (TRA-pPCI) group of 106 cases and transfemoral artery access for primary PCI (TFA-pPCI) group of 102 cases during Sept, 2000 to Aug, 2002 The protocols of the manipulation duration and the effect as well the incidence of complications such as bleeding, vessel injury,thrombi and embolism of TRA-pPCI and TFA-pPCI procedures were compared respectively The incidence of vessel spasm was observed and the effect of medicine administration to prevent from and relieve the vascular spasm was evaluated The inner diameter and blood velocity of the right and left radial artery as well the complications of radial artery were compared following up 1 month after TRA-pPCI procedure, respectively Results Two cases in each of TRA-pPCI and TFA-pPCI group were crossed over each other because of the failed procedure of the transradial or transfemoral access One handred and six vessels associated with 28 vessels of total occlusion in TRA-pPCI group and 102 vessels with 34 vessels in total occlusion in TFA-pPCI group were angioplasticized There were no significant difference in the averagetime of puncture in access artery,of engaging in target vessels of guiding catheters,door to balloon and of the total procedure of PCI between the two groups (18 3±3 3s vs 16 9±4 2s;6 0±1 6min vs 5 8±0 9min;45 3±19 6min vs 42 8±22 7min; 49 2±24 1min vs 46 5±26 4min,P>0 05) The successful rates of the first time puncture in access artery, the re-patence IRA and pPCI were similar in TRA-pPCI and TFA-pPCI groups (93 4% vs 96 1%;100% vs 100%;96 2% vs 97 1%,P>0 05) The access artery complications such a
出处 《中华心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第8期573-577,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cardiology
关键词 桡动脉 股动脉 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 急性心肌梗死 心肌梗塞 血管成形术 Myocardial infarction Radial artery Femoral artery Angioplasty,transluminal,pecutaneous coronary
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Kim MH, Cha KS, Kim H J, et al. Primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction via the transradial approach: a safe and useful alternative to the wansfemoral approach. J Invasive Cardiol,2000,12 :292-296. 被引量:1
  • 2Mathias DW, Bigler L. Transradial coronary angioplasty and stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction: initial experience. J Invasive Cardiol,2000 ,12:547-549. 被引量:1
  • 3Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Allain A, et al. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: The CARAFE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2001,52 : 181-187. 被引量:1
  • 4Louvard Y, Ludwig J, Lefevre T, et at. Transradial approach for coronary angioplasty in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a dual center registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2002,55:206-211. 被引量:1
  • 5Saito S, Miyake S, Hosokawa G, et at. Transradial coronary intervention in Japanese patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 1999,46:37-42. 被引量:1
  • 6Wu CJ, Lo PH, Chang KC, et al. Transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty in Chinese patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Diag,1997,40:159-163. 被引量:1
  • 7Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, et at. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 1999,46 : 173-178. 被引量:1
  • 8Yakubov SJ, George KS. Brachial and radial approach to coronary intervention. In: Freed M, Grines C, Safian RD, eds. The new manual of interventional cardiology. Michigan: Physician' s Press, 1996.65-73. 被引量:1
  • 9Mann T, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, et al. Stentlng in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am Coll Cardlol, 1998,32:572-576. 被引量:1
  • 10Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerkea D, et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by radial,brachial and femoral approaches: the ACCESS study. J Am Coil Cardial, 1997,79 : 1239-1241. 被引量:1

同被引文献306

引证文献54

二级引证文献197

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部