期刊文献+

Comparative study on stability and coke deposition over supported Rh and FePO_4 catalysts for oxy-bromination of methane

Comparative study on stability and coke deposition over supported Rh and FePO_4 catalysts for oxy-bromination of methane
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Rhodium- and iron phosphate-based catalysts are by far the most promising catalysts for oxy-bromination of methane(OBM) reaction. However, most literature reported either Rh- or FePO4-based catalysts, and the results were rarely studied in a uniform environmental condition. In this report, comparative study was conducted on silica- and silicon carbide-supported rhodium and iron phosphate catalysts with the main focuses on stability performance and coke deposition. The catalytic results demonstrated that the stability of both Rh- and FePO4-based catalysts was greatly influenced by the supports used, and silicon carbide-supported catalysts showed much better anti-coking ability as compared with silica-supported ones. Temperature-programmed oxidation over the used catalysts further indicated that the coke formation mechanisms were completely different between silica-supported rhodium and iron phosphate catalysts. While cokes might be caused by condensation of CH2Br2over supported iron phosphate, methane decomposition might be the reason for coke formation over silica-supported rhodium catalyst. These findings might pave the way for designing highly efficient and stable catalysts of the OBM reaction. Rhodium- and iron phosphate-based catalysts are by far the most promising catalysts for oxy-bromination of methane(OBM) reaction. However, most literature reported either Rh- or FePO4-based catalysts, and the results were rarely studied in a uniform environmental condition. In this report, comparative study was conducted on silica- and silicon carbide-supported rhodium and iron phosphate catalysts with the main focuses on stability performance and coke deposition. The catalytic results demonstrated that the stability of both Rh- and FePO4-based catalysts was greatly influenced by the supports used, and silicon carbide-supported catalysts showed much better anti-coking ability as compared with silica-supported ones. Temperature-programmed oxidation over the used catalysts further indicated that the coke formation mechanisms were completely different between silica-supported rhodium and iron phosphate catalysts. While cokes might be caused by condensation of CH2Br2over supported iron phosphate, methane decomposition might be the reason for coke formation over silica-supported rhodium catalyst. These findings might pave the way for designing highly efficient and stable catalysts of the OBM reaction.
出处 《Journal of Energy Chemistry》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2014年第1期29-34,共6页 能源化学(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.21103170)
关键词 METHANE RH FEPO4 oxy-bromination STABILITY coke deposition methane Rh FePO4 oxy-bromination stability coke deposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献80

  • 1Wang H W,Zhou L B.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D-Journal of Automobile Engineering,2003,217(D9):819. 被引量:1
  • 2Arkharov A M,Glukhov S D,Grekhov L V,Zherdev A A,Ivashchenko N A,Kalinin D N,Sharaburin A V,Aleksandrov A A.Chem Petro Eng,2003,39(5-6):330. 被引量:1
  • 3Ge Q J,Huang Y M,Qiu F Y,Li S B.Appl Catal A,1998,167(1):23. 被引量:1
  • 4Kaeding W W,Butter S A.JCatal,1980,61(1):155. 被引量:1
  • 5Spivey J J.Chem Eng Commun,1991,110:123. 被引量:1
  • 6Cai G Y,Liu Z M,Shi R M,He C Q,Yang L X,Sun C L,Chang Y J.Appl Catal A,1995,125(1):29. 被引量:1
  • 7Berkhour H.Aerosol Spray Rep,1994,33(7-8):385. 被引量:1
  • 8Heide R,Lippold H,Schenk J.DE 4 338 029.1995. 被引量:1
  • 9Vishwanathan V,Jun K W,Kim J W,Roh H S.Appl Catal A,2004,276(1-2):251. 被引量:1
  • 10Yaripour F,Baghaei F,Schmidt I,Perregaard J.Catal Commun,2005,6(2):147. 被引量:1

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部