摘要
《大乘起信论》是佛教中国化的标志性论典,唐君毅、牟宗三对其作了不同诠释。通过真伪、真如生灭、判教与思想合理性等方面的对比可见,二者在某些具体细节理解上具有相似点;其不同诠释及判教差异,源于对'真如缘起'理解不同,导致产生不同归趣。唐君毅倾向华严,牟宗三倾向天台,形成两种诠释路径。在哲学范畴比较方面,牟宗三更以'一心开二门'沟通康德哲学,试图将'设准'转为'呈现',将'理论形上学'转为'实践形上学'或'道德形上学'。
The Awakening of Faith Sutra was a symbol classical work of Chinese Buddhism,Tang Junyi and Mou Zongsan interpreted it differently.By comparing Tang’s explanation with Mou’s,we found that their different opinions came from their different beliefs in Chinese Buddhism,though they have something in common.Tang preferred the Huayan School,Mou preferred the Lotus Sutra Schoo. In the framework of One Mind with Two Aspects,Mou linked up Chinese philosophy with Kant’s philosophy,and he attempted to turn'assumption'to'appearance',turn'theorical metaphysics'to'practical metaphysics'or'moral metaphysics'.
出处
《思想与文化》
CSSCI
2018年第2期307-322,共16页
Thought & Culture
关键词
起信论
唐君毅
牟宗三
真如
一心开二门
The Awakening of Faith Sutra
Tang Junyi
Mou Zongsan
Thusness
One Mind with Two Aspects
