摘要
质量保证期依托于买卖双方约定的期限担保合同或者条款而存在,保质期、保修期、'三包'期与质量保证期并不存在本质上的不同,属于质量保证期在不同场合的不同称呼。质量保证期的起算点为标的物被交付之日,其时长通过当事人的约定来确定,但在立法上规定了最低要求的,如'三包'期、保质期、保修期等,相关约定则不得低于该相关标准。其法律效力与瑕疵异议期相同,与瑕疵违约救济权的生成有关,积极法律效力发生的条件应当仅为标的物在该期间之内出现了瑕疵。尽管瑕疵异议期与质量保证期的法律效力相同,但两者在存在基础、法律效力的实现条件及起算点、时长的确定等方面均存在不同,因此不能将两者混同。由于诉讼时效的法律效力与瑕疵违约救济权的行使而非瑕疵违约救济权的生成有关,因此也不能将诉讼时效与质量保证期混同。
The quality guarantee period grows out of period of guarantee contract or clause.There is no essential difference among the shelf life,warranty period,the 'three guarantees' period and the quality guarantee period.Actually the shelf life,warranty period and the 'three guarantees' period are different name of the quality guarantee period in different situation.Its starting point is delivery day of the subject matter and its duration is confirmed by parties’ agreements,but if legislations have minimum requirement,such as the 'three guarantees' period,warranty period and so on,the agreement should not be lower than the standard in legislations.Its legal force is the produce of relief rights as the same as the defective objection period’ s,whose occurred condition is only that defects turns up within the quality guarantee period.Although the he defective objection period and the quality guarantee period has the same legal force,they are different in the foundation for existence,the implementation condition of legal force,starting point and duration.Therefore,it is not right to confuse the quality guarantee period and the defective objection period.It is also not right to confuse the quality guarantee period and the prescription period,because the prescription period’ s legal force is concerned with the exertion of relief rights rather than the produce of relief rights.
出处
《私法》
CSSCI
2017年第1期260-279,共20页
Private Law Review
关键词
质量保证期
期限担保
瑕疵异议期
诉讼时效
the Quality Guarantee Period
Guarantee Period Contract
Defective Objection Period
Prescription Period
