期刊文献+

美国法律史研究中有关私人产权的几个问题 被引量:11

Private Property Rights in American Legal History
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国法律对私人产权的保护 ,并不等于私有财产神圣不可侵犯。美国法律史研究表明 ,这个国家的法律不是只保护既得权利 ,而是更倾向于保护动态产权 ;它不是只保护私人产权 ,而是对公共权利也相当重视 ;它不是只保护现有产权 ,而是在创造新产权上也敢于进行尝试。为了经济增长和社会发展 ,美国法律并不畏惧必要时限制私人产权。正是由于在私人产权和社会经济的长远利益之间保持了一定的平衡 。 There is no doubt that American laws protect private property rights. But it does not mean that private property rights are sacred and inviolable. American legal history tells us that what has been protected is not just vested rights but, more importantly, the dynamic property rights; not just private property rights but also public property rights. The laws not only protect existing property rights but also attempt to create new property rights. Whenever it is necessary, the American legal system has been ready to promote economic growth and social development by limiting private property rights. Partly because of the balance between private property rights and long-term social benefits, we have witnessed the great success of the American capitalist economy in spite of its problems.
作者 韩铁
出处 《美国研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第1期30-47,共18页 The Chinese Journal of American Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献71

  • 1Bernard H. Siegan, Property and Freedom : The Constitution, the Courts, and Land-Use Reulation (New Brunswick, N. J. : Transaction Publishers, 1997), pp. 5-9. 被引量:1
  • 2James W. Ely, Jr. , The Guardian of Every Other Rights : A Constitutional History of Property Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), p. 134. 被引量:1
  • 3Bernard H. Siegan, Property Rights : From Magna Carta to the Fourteenth Amendment (New Brunswick, N. J. : Transaction Publishers, 2001), pp. 123-126, 286-287. 被引量:1
  • 4A. W. B. Simpson, "Land Ownership and Economic Freedom," in Harry N. Scheiber, ed. ,The State and Freedom of Contract (Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1998),p. 17. 被引量:1
  • 5J. Pepter Byrne, "What We Talk about When We Talk about Property Rights : A Response to Carol Rose's Property as the Keystone Right.?"Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 71, 1996,p. 1049. 被引量:1
  • 6Edward S. Corwin, "The Basic Doctrine of American Constitutional Law," Michigan Law Review, Vol. 12 , 1914, pp. 247-276. 被引量:1
  • 7Edward J. Erler, "The Great Fence to Liberty: The Right to Property in the American Founding," in Ellen Frankel Paul & Howard Dickman, eds. , Liberty, Property, &. the Foundation of the American Constitution (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989), pp. 43-63. 被引量:1
  • 8Gregory S. Alexander, Commodity and Propriety : Competing Visions of Property in American Legal Thought, 1776-1970 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997), pp. 60-71. 被引量:1
  • 9Charles Francis Adams, ed. , The Works of John Adams (Boston.. Little, Brown and Company, 1851), Vol. 6, p. 280. 被引量:1
  • 10Max Farrand, ed. , The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 (New Haven.. Yale University Press, 1966), p. 147. 被引量:1

引证文献11

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部