期刊文献+

运用主客观结合评估法评价胸外科术后患者活动性疼痛治疗效果研究 被引量:37

Subjective and Objective Assessment of the Therapeutic Effect of Activity-induced Pain after Thoracic Surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景目前,我国关于术后活动性疼痛的研究较少,多数研究并未说明是在静息状态还是活动状态下的疼痛,只是笼统评估患者术后疼痛;而且近年来国内外研究均指出,活动状态下疼痛减轻才能保证患者术后躯体功能最大程度恢复;此外,部分研究所用的疼痛评估方法仅是患者主观自评,不能全面评估患者的疼痛情况。目的运用主客观结合评估法评估胸外科术后患者活动性疼痛治疗效果。方法选取2018年8—9月锦州医科大学附属第一医院胸外科收治的全身麻醉胸腔镜下且术中冷冻切片显示为肺癌的肺叶切除术后患者15例,运用数字评定量表(NRS)和四等级功能活动评分法(FAS)评估患者术后第1天、拔管当天、拔管后第1天、预约出院日在氟比洛芬酯用药前后0.5 h(即10:00、11:30和16:00、17:30)有效咳嗽时疼痛程度和完成有效咳嗽的能力。结果术后第1天、拔管当天、拔管后第1天、预约出院日患者10:00和11:30的NRS评分、16:00和17:30的NRS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后第1天、拔管后第1天、预约出院日患者4个不同时刻NRS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);拔管当天4个不同时刻NRS评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后第1天、拔管当天、拔管后第1天、预约出院日患者10:00的NRS评分、11:30的NRS评分、16:00的NRS评分、17:30的NRS评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论目前患者活动性疼痛控制情况较稳定;但引流管的刺激仍然是影响患者疼痛的明显因素。 Background At present,most of domestic studies about postoperative pain evaluate the pain in general without explaining whether it is rest pain or activity-induced pain.Studies about postoperative activity-induced pain in China are very limited.Recently,it has been widely pointed out in studies at home and abroad that the relief of activity-induced pain can ensure maximal postoperative recovery of physical function.In addition,most of the pain assessment methods used in some studies are only subjective self-evaluation from patients,which is not comprehensive enough.Objective To subjectively and objectively evaluate the therapeutic effect of postoperative activity-induced pain in patients with thoracic surgery.Methods We selected 15 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under general anesthesia in Department of Thoracic Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University during August to September,2018.All of them received an intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of lung cancer.We adopted four grade Functional Activity Score(FAS) to evaluate the patient’s ability to cough effectively within 30 minutes before or after taking flurbiprofen axetil 4 times daily(namely at 10:00,11:30, 16:00,and 17:30) and used Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) to evaluate the intensity of pain during effective coughing,on the 1 st day after surgery,the day of extubation,the 1 st day after extubation,and the discharge day,respectively.Results There were no significant differences between the average NRS scores of the patients at 10:00 and 11:30,and between theaverage NRS scores at 16:00 and 17:30 on the 1 st day after surgery,the day of extubation,the 1 st day after extubation,and the discharge day(P>0.05).The average NRS scores of the patients at 10:00,11:30,16:00 and 17:30 were similar on the 1 st day after surgery,and they were also similar on the 1 st day after extubation,and the discharge day(P>0.05).The average NRS score of the patients at 10:00,11:30,16:00 and 17:30 on the day of extubation var
作者 周利娟 张岚 ZHOU Lijuan;ZHANG Lan(School of Nursing,Jinzhou Medical University,Jinzhou 121001,China;Department of Nursing,the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University,Jinzhou 121004,China)
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS 北大核心 2019年第8期994-998,共5页 Chinese General Practice
关键词 疼痛 手术后 数字评定量表 功能活动评分法 Pain,postoperative Numerical rating scale Functional activity score
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献112

  • 1王俊.电视胸腔镜在胸部疾病治疗中的应用现状[J].临床外科杂志,2005,13(6):384-385. 被引量:82
  • 2彭聿平,邱一华,张清泉,王健鹤.去甲肾上腺素对T淋巴细胞增殖的影响[J].中国应用生理学杂志,1995,11(1):75-78. 被引量:14
  • 3徐迎春,万学英,王庆华.术后疼痛评估及镇痛护理进展[J].国际护理学杂志,2006,25(5):329-332. 被引量:158
  • 4方积乾,医学统计学与电脑实验,1997年,240页 被引量:1
  • 5Diggle P,Analysis of Longitudinal Data,1994年 被引量:1
  • 6Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, et al. Studies compar- ing Ntmaerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Ana- logue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: systematic lit- erature review[J].J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011, 41(6):1073-1093. 被引量:1
  • 7Hjermstad MJ, Gibbins J, Hangen DF, et al. Pain assessment tools in palliative care: an urgent need for consensus[]]. Palliat Med. 2008, 22 (8) :895-903. 被引量:1
  • 8Melzack R. The McGiU Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods[J]. Pain.1975, 1:277-299. 被引量:1
  • 9Melzack R. The short-form McGiU Pain {~aestionnaire[J]. Pain. 1987, 30(2):191-197. 被引量:1
  • 10Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Revicki DA, et al. Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPI~-2)[J]. Pain. 2009, 144:35-42. 被引量:1

共引文献419

同被引文献370

引证文献37

二级引证文献114

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部