期刊文献+

ITS方案的多属性多层次模糊评价方法研究 被引量:5

Multi-attribute and multi-layer fuzzy evaluation of IT S
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对ITS方案评价中诸多非精确量、且属性复杂的评价条件,基于多层模糊推理提出了一种多属性多层次、综合考虑各种定性和定量条件的ITS方案评价方法.这种方法将多个评价属性分成定性和定量两大类,每个大类再将属性分层次评价,最后将评价结果进行合成后得出最终的综合评价排序.通过一个ITS例子的仿真应用,说明了该方法的具体步骤以及其有效性. It is very difficult to give a satisfactory evaluation o f an intelligent transportation system (ITS) project because of many non_precise and complex v ariables in it. Based upon multi_layer fuzzy reasoning, a multi_attribute and mu lti_layer fuzzy evaluation of ITS is proposed. Firstly, all evaluating attribute s are divided two parts: qualitative and quantitative items. Then, both parts ar e analyzed hierarchical respectively. The last synthesis evaluated compositor is got by integrating each evaluation. A simulating example of ITS evaluation show s the steps of the method and its validity.
作者 金春霞 王慧
出处 《系统工程学报》 CSCD 2003年第1期77-82,共6页 Journal of Systems Engineering
基金 浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(601119).
关键词 ITS 多属性多层次模糊评价方法 智能交通系统 系统工程 fuzzy logic evaluation ITS multiple attribute multiple layer
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]Saaty T L. Modelling unstructured decision problems-the theory of analytical hierarchies [J]. Math. Comput. Simulation, 1978, 20(2): 147-158 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Laarhoven P J M, Pedrycz W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1983, 11(3) : 229-241 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Bellman R E, Zadeh L A. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment [J]. Management Sci., 1970,17(4): 141-164 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Baas S, Kwakernaak H. Rating and ranking of multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets [J]. Automatica,1977, 13(1): 47-58 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Dong W M, Wong F S. Fuzzy weighted averages and implementation of the extension principle [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1987, 21(2): 183-199 被引量:1

同被引文献40

引证文献5

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部