摘要
目的比较克氏针与钢板在桡骨远端骨折治疗中的效果。方法整群选取2012年1月—2015年1月该院收治的桡骨远端骨折患者86例进行观察,分成两组,观察组43例采用切开复位钢板内固定,对照组43例采用闭合复位克氏钉固定。结果观察组优良率为83.7%,对照组优良率为72.1%,两组比较有差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率为2.3%,对显著优于对照组并发症发生率16.3%(P<0.05)。结论桡骨远端骨折切开复位钢板固定疗效显著优于克氏针,值得应用。
Objective To compare the effect of the treatment of the distal radius fracture with the Kirschner wire and the steel plate. Methods An observation was conducted on the 86 patients with distal radius fractures treated in our department from January 2012 to January 2015. The patients were divided into 2 groups, the observation group and the control group with 43 cases in each. Patients in the observation group were treated by open reduction and internal fixation with steel plate, and those in the con-trol group were treated by closed reduction and fixation with Kirschner wire. Results The good and excellent rate was 83.7% in the observation group, and that was 72.1% in the control group, the difference between the two groups was significant(P<0.05). The observation group had much lower incidence of complications than the control group(2.3% vs 16.3%)(P<0.05). Conclusion For the treatment of distal radius fracture, the curative effect of open reduction and internal fixation with steel plate is better than that of fixation with Kirschner wire, so the former is worthy of application.
出处
《中外医疗》
2015年第28期56-57,共2页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词
克氏针
钢板
桡骨远端骨折
Kirschner wire
Steel plate
Distal radius fracture
