期刊文献+

血清lncRNA HIF1A-AS1在结直肠癌诊断中临床意义 被引量:7

Clinical significance of serum lncRNA HIF1A-AS1 in diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨lncRNA HIF1A-AS1在结直肠癌患者血清中的表达及其与临床病理特征及预后的关系。方法结直肠癌患者105例为结直肠癌组,体检健康者100例为对照组,采用实时荧光定量PCR检测2组血清lncRNAHIF1A-AS1相对表达量。将结直肠癌组以血清lncRNA HIF1A-AS1相对表达量中位数分为高表达组(lncRNAHIF1A-AS1相对表达量≥1.51)和低表达组(lncRNA HIF1A-AS1相对表达量<1.51),分析血清lncRNA HIF1A-AS1相对表达量与结直肠癌临床病理特征间关系;绘制ROC曲线,分析血清lncRNA HIF1A-AS1表达水平对结直肠癌的诊断效能;采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,评估血清lncRNA HIF1A-AS1表达对结直肠癌患者生存率的影响;采用Cox比例风险回归模型分析结直肠癌预后不良的危险因素。结果结直肠癌组血清lncRNA HIF1A-AS1相对表达量(2.81±0.02)高于对照组(0.97±0.01)(P<0.05);以血清lncRNA HIF1A-AS1相对表达量1.82为最佳截断值,lncRNA HIF1A-AS1诊断结直肠癌的AUC为0.873(95%CI:0.830~0.916,P<0.001),灵敏度为75.5%,特异度为96.0%;高表达组肿瘤低分化(25.00%)、肿瘤直径>5cm(48.08%)、T_3~T_4期(46.15%)、N_(1-3)期(40.38%)、M_1期(50.00%)、TNM分期Ⅲ~Ⅳ期(67.31%)比率明显高于低表达组(20.75%、24.53%、22.64%、26.42%、37.74%、37.74%)(P<0.05),总生存时间[(481±37)d]短于低表达组[(695±53)d](P<0.05),年龄、性别比例和肿瘤位置与低表达组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);血清lncRNA HIF1A-AS1高表达是结直肠癌患者预后不良的独立危险因素(HR=3.165,95%CI:1.218~5.085,P=0.008)。结论血清lncRNA HIF1A-AS1在结直肠癌患者中表达上调,其可作为结直肠癌早期诊断和评估预后的潜在生物标志物。 Objective To investigate the expression of serum lncRNA HIF1 A-AS1 in colorectal carcinoma(CRC)and its correlation with the clinicopathological features and prognosis of CRC.Methods Real-time fluorescence PCR was used to measure the relative expressions of serum lncRNA HIF1 A-AS1 in 105 patients with CRC(CRC group)and 100 healthy volunteers(control group).CRC group was redivided into high expression group(lncRNA HIF1 A-AS1 relative expression≥1.51)and low expression group(lncRNA HIF1 A-AS1 relative expression<1.51)according to the median of relative expression of lncRNA HIF1 A-AS1.The relationship between the relative expression of serum lncRNA HIF1 A-AS1 and clinicopathological features of CRC was analyzed.ROC was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of serum lncRNA HIF1 A-AS1 on CRC.Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of lncRNA HIF1 A-AS1 on the survival rate of CRC patients.Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze the risk factors for poor prognosis of CRC.Results The relative expression of lncRNA HIF1 A-AS1 was significantly higher in CRC group(2.81±0.02)than that in control group(0.97±0.01)(P<0.05).When the optimal cut-off value of lncRNA HIF1 A-AS1 was 1.82,the AUCvalue for CRC was 0.873(95%CI:0.830-0.916,P<0.001),the sensitivity was 75.5% and specificity was 96.0%,respectively.The proportations of poorly differentiated tumor(25.00%),tumor diameter>5 cm(48.08%),T3-T4 stage(46.15%),N1-3 stage(40.38%),M1 stage(50.00%)and TNM stageⅢ-Ⅳ(67.31%)in high expression group were significantly higher than those in low expression group(20.75%,24.53%,22.64%,26.42%,37.74%,37.74%)(P<0.05).The overall survival time was significantly shorter in high expression group((481±37)d)than that in low expression group((695±53)d)(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in age,gender and tumor location between high and low expression groups(P>0.05).High expression of serum lncRNA HIF1 A-AS1 was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis of CRC(HR=3.165,95%CI:1.218-
作者 郑凤萍 罗巨利 王爱华 ZHENG Fengping;LUO Juli;WANG Aihua(Department of Anorectal Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Changsha410007,China)
出处 《中华实用诊断与治疗杂志》 2019年第2期143-146,共4页 Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy
基金 湖南省科技计划项目(S2012F1023) 湖南省科技厅项目(W2012ZT71)
关键词 结直肠癌 长链非编码RNA lncRNA HIF1A-AS1 预后 colorectal carcinoma long non-coding RNA lncRNA HIF1A-AS1 prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献32

  • 1李连弟,鲁凤珠.1990—1992年中国恶性肿瘤死亡流行分布情况分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1996,18(6):403-407. 被引量:226
  • 2Steward B W, Kleihues P. World Cancer Report[M]. Lyon: IARC Press,2003 : 198-202. 被引量:1
  • 3Parkin D M, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2005,55(4):74 108. 被引量:1
  • 4Nyam D C, Tang C B, Ang M, et al. Surgery for colorectal cancer in the octogenarian[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 1999,3(9): 23- 26. 被引量:1
  • 5Davila J A, Rabeneek L, Berger D H, et al. Postoperative 30 day mortality following surgical resection for colorectal cancer in veterans: changes in the right direction[J]. Dig Dis Sci,2005,50 (9) : 1722-1728. 被引量:1
  • 6Alvarez J A, Baldonedo R F, Bear I G, et al. Presentation, treatment, and multivariate analysis of risk factors for obstructive and perforative colorectal carcinoma[J]. Am J Surg, 2005,190(3) :376 382. 被引量:1
  • 7Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, etal. The impact of the risk factor "age" on the early postoperative results of surgery for colorectal carcinoma and its significance for perioperative management[J]. World J Surg,2005,29(8) : 1013L1021. 被引量:1
  • 8Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance[J]. J Am Coll Surg,2006,202(3): 439 444. 被引量:1
  • 9Gureviteh AJ, I)avidovitch B, Kashtan H. Outcome of right colectomy for cancer in octogenarians[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2009,13(1) : 100-104. 被引量:1
  • 10Nagasaki T, Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, et al. Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for metachronous colorectal cancer[J]. Surg Today,2015,45(4):434-438. 被引量:1

共引文献56

同被引文献75

引证文献7

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部