摘要
亨廷顿提出"文明冲突"的范式作为理解未来国际政治的新思路,遭到了来自世界范围内的批判。在批判文明冲突论的过程中,一些学者、政要提出与之相对的"文明对话"理念并推进了一系列政治实践。"文明对话论"的提出和实践尽管有诸多积极意义,但它仍然存在回避文化自省问题、过于强调政治正确性、单一身份思维缺陷等缺失。文明对话论在占据道德高地对文明冲突论进行批判的过程中,也需要对自身理论的缺失进行必要的反思。
The paradigm of " Clash of civilizations" which was raised by Samuel Huntington as a new way to understand the future international politics,aroused criticism from the world.In the process of criticizing his theory,some scholars,politicians and religious leaders brought up the concept of " Dialogue among civilizations" and pushed forward a series of political practices.Although the proposition and practice of " Dialogue among civilizations" have many positive impacts,it still has deficiencies such as avoiding culture self-communion,over-emphasis on political correctness and paradigm defects of singular identity thinking.The theory of " Dialogue among civilizations" requires necessary reflection on its own deficiencies while it is applied to criticize the theory of " Clash of civilizations" by standing on the moral high ground.
出处
《广西民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第6期132-138,共7页
JOURNAL OF GUANGXI MINZU UNIVERSITY:PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION
基金
2015年国家社会科学基金一般项目"网络虚拟社会协商民主的实现机制研究"(项目编号:15BZZ085)
关键词
文明冲突论
文明对话论
文化自省
单一身份思维
theory of" Clash of civilizations"
theory of" Dialogue among civilizations"
culture self-communion
singular identity thinking
