摘要
跨国公司人权环境损害的问责机制是全球治理的焦点之一。跨国公司在投资贸易中获得的权利、利益与其在国际法下承担的义务、责任不符。跨国公司通常利用发展中国家治理薄弱及其复杂结构和独立法人制度逃避法律责任,使得受害者难以获得司法或司法外救济。本文分析和批判了传统国际法下的国家中心责任模式的不足,并将企业社会责任理论纳入国际法治框架,结合最新国际实践和建构性解释,探寻跨国公司直接责任是否存在及何以建立的问题。
The accountability mechanism for the human rights abuses and environmental damage of transnational corporations is one of the core issues of global governance.The rights and interests of transnational corporations in investment and trade are inconsistent with their obligations and responsibilities under international law.Transnational corporations often take advantage of the weak governance in developing countries as well as their complex structure and independent legal personality to evade legal responsibilities,making it difficult for victims to obtain effective judicial or extrajudicial remedies.This paper analyzes and criticizes the shortcomings of state-centric responsibility model in traditional international law,and incorporates the theory of corporate social responsibility into international rule of law,combined with latest international practice and constructive interpretations,aiming to explore the existence and the establishment of direct responsibilities of transnational corporations.
作者
何志鹏
王惠茹
He Zhipeng;Wang Huiru
出处
《国际经济法学刊》
CSSCI
2019年第3期1-14,共14页
Journal of International Economic Law
关键词
跨国公司
问责机制
国家中心责任
国际法治
直接责任
Transnational Corporations
Accountability Mechanism
State-Centric Responsibility
International Rule of Law
Direct Responsibility
