摘要
相较于传统侵权理论构建的法律关系,大数据侵权的侵权主体、侵权行为、损害结果均更为复杂多变,导致因果关系的证明和判断陷入困境,不利于侵权法权利救济功能的发挥。基于个人信息主体证明能力相对薄弱的情况,根据技术依赖性标准、风险控制责任标准,结合事实推定规则,在沿用规范说分配证明责任的同时,应对特定情形采用证明责任倒置的分配方式。
Compared with the legal relationships constructed by traditional tort theories,the subjects,acts,and damage outcomes of big data infringement are more complex and variable.This complexity complicates the proof and judgment of causality,hindering the remedial function of tort law.Given the relatively weak ability of individuals to provide proof,and based on standards of technological dependency and risk control responsibility,along with the rules of factual presumption,it is advisable to adopt a reversed burden of proof in specific situations while continuing to apply the normative approach for allocating the burden of proof.
出处
《理论与现代化》
2024年第6期36-50,共15页
Theory and Modernization
关键词
大数据侵权
因果关系
证明责任
判断标准
big data infringement
causality
burden of proof
evaluation criteria
