期刊文献+

实证法学研究与中国自主法学知识体系的构建——第十届数量法学论坛暨国际学术研讨会综述

Empirical Legal Studies and the Construction of China’s Independent Legal Knowledge System:A Summary of the Tenth Quantitative Legal Forum and International Academic Symposium
下载PDF
导出
摘要 湖南大学主办的第十届数量法学论坛暨国际学术研讨会于2024年6月在长沙举行,来自国内外20余所高校、研究机构的60余名与会学者围绕“实证法学研究与中国自主法学知识体系的构建”这一主题进行了研讨。与会专家从法学实证研究的理论与实践进展、数字时代的挑战与应对等角度,围绕公共政策与司法制度的实证效能、法官裁判行为实证检视和数字法治的方法革新与实践探索等重大基础理论和前沿问题进行了深入对话,立足中国法治实践,融通国外优秀研究经验,形成了一系列自主性、原创性知识及理论。面对数字时代新的挑战和机遇,与会专家一致认为法学实证研究的应对之策在于不断更新知识体系与研究方法,加强跨学科、跨国的合作交流,进一步构建具有自主性、原创性、科学性、标识性、包容性的中国自主法学知识体系。 June 2024,the 10th Quantitative Law Forum and International Academic Symposium sponsored by Hunan University was held in Changsha.Nearly 200 scholars from more than 20 universities and research institutions at home and abroad discussed the theme of“empirical legal research and the construction of China’s independent legal knowledge system”.From the perspectives of the theoretical and practical progress of legal empirical research,challenges and responses in the digital era,the participating experts conducted in-depth dialogues on some major basic theories and frontier issues,such as the empirical effectiveness of public policy and judicial system,the empirical review of judges’adjudication behavior,and the method innovation and practical exploration of digital rule of law.Based on China’s rule of law practice,they integrated excellent foreign research experience.A series of theories of autonomy and originality have been formed.In the face of the new challenges and opportunities of the digital age,the experts agreed that the solution to legal empirical research is to constantly update the knowledge system and research methods,strengthen interdisciplinary and transnational cooperation and exchanges,and further build China’s independent legal knowledge system that is independent,original,scientific,distinctive and inclusive.
作者 黄舒琪 Huang Shuqi
机构地区 湖南大学法学院
出处 《湖湘法学评论》 2024年第4期127-137,共11页 Huxiang Law Revie
关键词 法学实证研究 中国自主法学知识体系 司法制度 裁判行为 数字法治 legal empirical research China’s independent legal knowledge system the judicial system the act of judging digital rule of law
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献430

共引文献434

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部