期刊文献+

论杜甫与柳宗元诗歌对社会现实的呈现——以“三吏”与《田家三首》为例

On the Presentation of Social Reality in the Poetries of DU Fu and LIU Zongyuan:Take"Three Officials"and Three Poetries of the Tian Family as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 杜甫的“三吏”系列和柳宗元的《田家三首》均展现了两人对官民冲突及农民困苦的深刻洞察,尽管他们都关注社会问题,但在创作视野、风格和哲学理念上却存在显著差异。杜甫的诗歌以情感色彩浓烈,风格沉郁顿挫著称,倾向于国家宏观视角,强调“小我”服从“大我”;而柳宗元的诗歌则情感克制,风格中庸清淡,更多地关注“小我”,展现个体在社会不公面前的尊严与抗议。杜甫对儒家理论的内化使其作品自然流露出对社会民生的关怀,柳宗元则系统提出“辅时及物”理论并以之为创作原则之一,主张文学应当反映现实并促进社会进步。两人的作品反映了唐代社会的复杂性,同时也揭示了“小我”与“大我”之间的伦理张力,共同构建了唐代社会历史的文学画卷。 Du Fu's"Three Officials"series and Liu Zongyuan's Three Poetries of the Tian Family show their profound insight into the conflict between officials and civilians,as well as the struggles faced by peasants.Although they both pay attention to social problems,there are significant differences in their creative vision,style,and philosophical outlook.Du Fu's poetry has strong emotional color,and a depressed style,and tends to the national macro perspective,emphasizing that the"ego"should serve the greater good.In contrast,Liu Zongyuan's poetries are emotionally restrained,moderate and light in style,and pay more attention to the"ego",highlighting individual dignity and protesting against social injustice.Du Fu's internalization of Confucianism made his works naturally express concern for the welfare of the people.Liu Zongyuan systematically put forward the theory of"completing time and things"and took it as one of the creation principles,advocating that literature should reflect reality and promote social progress.Their works reflect the complexities of Tang society and reveal the ethical tension between the"ego"and"the collective",jointly creating a vivid literary portrait of Tang social history.
作者 师子康 SHI Zikang(Northwest University,Xi'an Shanxi 710119)
机构地区 西北大学
出处 《浙江万里学院学报》 2024年第6期64-70,共7页 Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University
关键词 杜甫 柳宗元 经世致用 大中 沉郁顿挫 诗歌转型 DU Fu LIU Zongyuan pragmatism large and medium-sized depressed and frustrated poetic transformation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1莫砺锋.穿透夜幕的诗思——论杜诗中的暮夜主题[J].文学遗产,2009(3):4-12. 被引量:14
  • 2张琰琰.近三十余年唐代胥吏问题研究述论[J].中国史研究动态,2016(1):23-30. 被引量:2
  • 3罗宗强著..隋唐五代文学思想史[M].北京:中华书局,2011:318.
  • 4周振甫译注..诗经译注[M].北京:中华书局,2002:516.
  • 5莫砺锋著..中国思想家评传丛书 杜甫评传[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2011:460.
  • 6李浩作..李浩学术文集 唐代关中士族与文学 第4版[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,2022:351.
  • 7杨再喜.探析柳宗元对杜甫诗歌的接受[J].聊城大学学报(社会科学版),2006(5):76-79. 被引量:1
  • 8葛晓音著..诗国高潮与盛唐文化[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1998:466.
  • 9葛景春著..李杜之变与唐代文化转型[M].开封:河南教育出版社,2009:377.
  • 10(宋)刘克庄著,辛更儒校注..中国古典文学基本丛书 刘克庄集笺校 第1册[M].北京:中华书局,2011:407.

二级参考文献89

共引文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部