摘要
在行政协议效力认定的问题上,公法主导论暴露出局限性。该模式过度依赖行政行为规则的优先适用,忽略了民事法律行为规则的功能价值。这不仅削弱了法律适用的灵活性,而且低估了案件审理的复杂性。与之相对,公私法协动论以综合性视角解决这些问题,推动公法与私法的有效互动,满足行政性与契约性的动态特性,并实现不同规则之间的功能整合。在理论层面,它通过承认、利用和协调差异,建立行政行为规则和民事法律行为规则相互协作的基础结构。在实践层面,它提倡动态考察各审查模块中行政性和契约性的要素组合,深入探讨如何使不同规则形成交互支持秩序,以提高裁判质量和平衡不同利益。公私法协动论应当取代公法主导论,成为行政协议司法审查的主导思想,推进行政法学的现代化。
Regarding the issue of determining the validity of administrative contracts,the public law-dominant theory reveals its limitations.This approach overly relies on the preferential application of administrative law rules,neglecting the functional value of civil legal rules.The result not only weakens the flexibility of legal application but also underestimates the complexity of case adjudication.In contrast,the theory of public-private law synergy addresses these issues from a comprehensive perspective,promoting effective interaction between public and private law to accommodate the dynamic nature of administrative and contractual elements,and to achieve functional integration between different sets of rules.At the theoretical level,it establishes a foundational structure for collaboration between administrative and civil legal rules by recognizing,utilizing,and coordinating their differences.At the practical level,it advocates for a dynamic examination of the combination of administrative and contractual elements in various review modules,delving into how different rules can form an interactive and supportive order to improve adjudication quality and balance competing interests.The theory of public-private law synergy should replace the public law-dominant theory as the guiding principle for judicial review of administrative contracts,thereby advancing the modernization of administrative law.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第6期1619-1637,共19页
Peking University Law Journal
基金
国家社科基金一般项目“法治政府建设视野中的无效行政行为认定研究”(项目编号:22BFX032)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
行政协议效力
公法主导论
公私法协动论
Validity of Administrative Contracts
Public Law Dominance Theory
Public-Private LawSynergyTheory
