摘要
《最高人民法院关于审理行政协议案件若干问题的规定》明确了基于行政优益权的变更解除权,并以此为中心设置了相应的诉讼请求和判决类型。但行政优益权的规定在本身要件不明的同时,还缺少从协议性出发观察变更解除类型的视角,此种规定方式不仅可能导致司法实践中协议的自治性受到不当限制,也会形成公益保护的漏洞。欲矫正此一偏误,须完整构建行政协议变更解除权体系,区分不同的类型和层次,适用相应法域的实体法与诉讼法规范。
In the"Provisions of the Supreme Peoples Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Administrative Agreement Cases",the Supreme Court clarifies the right to unilaterally change and terminate administrative agreements,which is based on the administrative privileges,and constructs corresponding claims and judicial judgments.However,the constitutive requirements of administrative privileges remain unclear and a consideration of agreement nature to observe the types of change and termination is absent.That may cause not only improper restrictions on agreement autonomy in judicial proceedings,but also loopholes in protecting public interests.To correct the deviation,the legislator needs to construct a comprehensive system of modification and rescission rights in administrative agreements,consisting of a clearer categorization of types and levels,to apply substantive and procedural rules of corresponding jurisdictions.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第2期465-483,共19页
Peking University Law Journal
关键词
行政协议
单方变更解除
行政优益权
情势变更
诉讼类型
Administrative Agreements
Unilateral Change and Termination
Administrative Privileges
Circumstance Change
Litigation Category
