期刊文献+

领导幽默与追随者建言行为:基于经验取样法的研究

Leader Humor and Follower Voice Behavior:A Study Based on Empirical Sampling Method
原文传递
导出
摘要 在激烈的市场竞争和工作环境中,领导幽默能够通过塑造工作场所乐趣提高生产力,得到了理论界和实践界的共同关注。已有研究更多关注领导幽默对追随者的角色内产出的影响,研究的理论视角通常以领导为中心,忽视了追随者在互动过程中的主动动机。因此,需要对领导幽默如何通过激发主动动机对追随者建言行为产生影响及其边界机制进行深入探讨。基于主动动机模型,从领导者和追随者的互动过程出发,探讨领导幽默对追随者建言行为的直接影响,角色宽度自我效能感、工作享受和积极情绪的中介效应,以及追随者权力距离在领导幽默和3种主动动机之间的调节效应。使用经验取样法,通过获取221名追随者连续5周的1028条有效数据,运用Mplus 8.0进行跨层分析,检验领导幽默对追随者建言行为的主效应,追随者权力距离的调节作用。采用蒙特卡洛20000次抽样进行分析,检验角色宽度自我效能感、工作享受和积极情绪的中介效应及其被调节的中介效应。研究结果表明,(1)领导幽默能够正向影响追随者建言行为。(2)角色宽度自我效能感、工作享受以及积极情绪在领导幽默与追随者建言行为之间发挥中介作用,且三者之间的中介作用没有显著差异。(3)追随者权力距离对领导幽默和工作享受之间的关系具有正向调节作用,权力距离越高,领导幽默对工作享受的积极影响越强。此外,追随者权力距离正向调节领导幽默通过工作享受对建言行为的中介作用,当权力距离较高时,工作享受的中介作用更强,从而表现出有调节的中介作用。但对角色宽度自我效能感和积极情绪两条中介路径没有显著影响。研究结果从领导者和追随者的互动过程出发,将领导幽默的作用效果从角色内扩展到角色外,并为领导幽默的作用机制增加了动机视角,从作用效果和理论视角两个方面拓展� In the fierce market competition and work environment,leader humor can improve productivity by amusing followers,which has attracted the attention of both theoretical and practical scholars.However,existing research has predominantly focused on the effects of leader humor on followers′in-role outputs,often adopting a leader-centric perspective and neglecting followers′proactive motivation in the interactive process.Therefore,it is necessary to explore how leader humor influences follower voice behavior through the activation of proactive motivation and investigate the boundary conditions.Based on the model of proactive motivation,this studystarts from the interaction process between leaders and followers,and explores the direct effect of leader humor on follower voice behavior investigates,the mediating effect of role breadth selfefficacy,work enjoyment and positive affect,and examines the moderating effect of follower power distance between leader humor and the three motivations.Data were collected through a five-week experience sampling method,resulting in 1,028 valid responses from 221 followers,and Mplus8.0 was used to conduct cross-level analysis to test the main effect of leader humor on followers voice behavior and the moderating effect of followers′power distance.Monte Carlo analysis of 20,000 samples was conducted to examine the mediating effects of role breadth self-efficacy,work enjoyment,and positive affect,as well as the moderated mediation effects.The findings are as follows:first,leader humor positively affect follower voice behavior.Second,role breadth self-efficacy,work enjoyment and positive affect play mediating roles between leader humor and voice behavior,and there is no significant difference among the three mediating roles.Third,followers′power distance positively moderates the relationship between leader humor and work enjoyment,with a stronger positive effect of leadership humor on work enjoyment when power distance is higher.Moreover,followers′power distance positively moderate
作者 贾建锋 赵若男 刘伟鹏 焦玉鑫 JIA Jianfeng;ZHAO Ruonan;LIU Weipeng;JIAO Yuxin(School of Business Administration,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110169,China;National Frontiers Science Center for Industrial Intelligence and Systems Optimization,Shenyang 110819,China;Key Laboratory of Data Analytics and Optimization for Smart Industry,Shenyang 110819,China)
出处 《管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第2期69-82,共14页 Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(71972032) 教育部中央高校基本科研业务费(N2406004)。
关键词 领导幽默 建言行为 主动动机模型 经验取样法 权力距离 leader humor voice behavior the model of proactive motivation empirical sampling method power distance
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献250

  • 1章凯,张必隐.兴趣对文章理解的作用[J].心理学报,1996,28(3):284-289. 被引量:43
  • 2郭晓薇.权力距离感对公平感与组织公民行为关系的调节作用研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(2):433-436. 被引量:23
  • 3陈国海,Rod A.Martin.大学生幽默风格与精神健康关系的初步研究[J].心理科学,2007,30(1):219-223. 被引量:60
  • 4Liu W, Zhu R, Yang Y. I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership [ J ]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2010,21 ( 1 ) : 189-202. 被引量:1
  • 5Huang X, De Vliert E V, Der Vegt G V. Breaking the silence culture:Stimulation of participation and employee opinion withholding cross-nationally [ J ]. Management and Organization Review, 2005,1 ( 3 ) : 459-482. 被引量:1
  • 6Walumbwa F O, Schaubroeck J. Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior:Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009,94 (5) : 1275-1286. 被引量:1
  • 7Detert J R, Trevino L K. Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice [ J ]. Organization Science, 2010, 21 ( 1 ) :249-270. 被引量:1
  • 8LePine J A, Van Dyne L. Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual perform- ance:Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001,86 ( 2 ) : 326-336. 被引量:1
  • 9Van Dyne L, LePine J A. Helping and voice extrarole behaviors:Evidence of construct and predictive validity [ J ]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1998,41 (1) :108-119. 被引量:1
  • 10Dozier J B, Miceli M P. Potential predictors of whistle- blowing : A prosocial behavior' perspective [ J ]. The Academy of Management Review, 1985,10 (4) : 823-836. 被引量:1

共引文献315

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部