摘要
亲社会行为作为亲社会属性的重要方面,一直是自然和社会科学研究的焦点。然而,对于人们是否能够形成亲社会行为的一般直觉倾向,仍存在争论。研究聚焦于慈善情境下的捐助行为,采用事件相关电位技术考察加工模式和情境紧急性对捐助行为的影响及其神经机制。行为结果发现,捐助行为受紧急性和捐助成本的双重影响,随着成本的增加,个体更愿意帮助紧急情境下的求助者。脑电结果发现,直觉加工比反思加工诱发了更大的前部N1波幅,而反思加工比直觉加工诱发了更大的P2波幅。在非紧急情境下,反思加工比直觉加工诱发了更大的P3波幅。这一结果表明加工模式不仅影响了个体的早期注意和对刺激的评估,还调节了晚期阶段对非紧急事件的认知投入。研究揭示了加工模式和事件紧急性对亲社会行为的影响,通过关注紧急性这一潜在调节因素为不一致结果指出了方向,扩展了对社会启发式假说的理解。
Prosocial behavior is suggested to be a central feature of human life and there is an ongoing debate regarding whether individuals have,therefore,developed a general intuitive tendency to act prosocially or not.Although previous studies have found various indicators of intuitive prosociality from different perspectives,evidence on the potential causal relationship between processing mods and prosocial behavior is mixed.The social heuristics hypothesis(SHH),as a theoretical framework to address this conflicting issue,suggests that associations between processing mode and prosocial behavior are complex and multifaceted,influenced by individual variability and the contexts in which it occurs.A previous study has revealed that intuitive prosocial behavior is more likely to emerge in a perceived emergency that require immediate response.We expected that processing mode(intuition vs.deliberation)will impact people’s decision-making in different helping situations.The study focused on charitable giving.Using event-related potentials(ERPs),we examined the neural mechanisms underlying the effects of processing mode and emergency on helping behaviors.We explored whether a neural signature that rapidly encodes the motivational salience of an event,the P3,can be regulated by processing mode×situation interaction or not.Participants were required to allocate varying amounts of money between themselves and charities they initially labelled as emergency or non-emergency situation that promoted intuitive or deliberative decision making.Each participant received 70 CNY.An instruction on the screen explained that the task required participants to“Accept”or“Reject”donation offers affecting their 70 CNY.To manipulate processing mode,each participant completed fast donation sessions where they were instructed to make decisions as fast as possible,and slow donation sessions where they were instructed to stop and reflect for at least 5 seconds before deciding.EEG signals were recorded during decision making.The behavioral re
作者
石荣
刘昌
唐慧琳
郝俊懿
沈汪兵
SHI Rong;LIU Chang;TANG Huilin;HAO Junyi;SHEN Wangbin(Department of Medical Psychology and Ethics,School of Basic Medical Sciences,Shandong University,Jinan 250012,China;School of Psychology,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210097,China;School of Teacher Education,Nanjing Xiaozhuang University,Nanjing 210097,China;School of Public Administration,Hohai University,Nanjing 210097,China)
出处
《心理学报》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2024年第9期1239-1251,共13页
Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金
教育部人文社会科学青年项目(22YJC190018)
山东省自然科学基金青年项目(ZR2022QC021)
中国博士后基金(2022M711914)资助。
关键词
加工模式
亲社会行为
紧急性
社会启发式假说
事件相关电位
processing mode
prosocial behavior
emergency
the social heuristics hypothesis
event-related potential(ERP)
