摘要
2023年11月欧盟理事会正式签署的《保护欧盟及其成员国免受第三国经济胁迫条例》具有“反胁迫”与“胁迫”的双重意图。一方面,《条例》立法背景由“反美国经济胁迫”逐渐转向为欧盟“胁迫”第三国辩护;另一方面,相较于2021年草案文本,2023年最终文本在内容设计上扩大了适用范围,授权欧盟理事会决定是否构成“经济胁迫”行为,进一步明确了欧盟的利益,强化了欧盟推进战略自主、实现更大地缘政治利益的战略目标。《条例》的生效在一定程度上会加剧中欧经贸关系政治化与安全化倾向,增加双边经贸摩擦,降低双方企业投资信心。鉴于此,中国应从舆论、外交及法律等多维度提前做好风险规避与应对预案。
Regulation(EU)2023/2675 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 November 2023 on the protection of the Union and its Member States from economic coercion by third countries(the Anti-Coercion Instrument)serves a dual purpose of"anti-coercion"and"coercion."On the one hand,the legislative background of the Anti-Coercion Instrument has gradually evolved from"anti-U.S.economic coercion"to the EU's defense of coercion"by third countries;on the other hand,compared with the 2021 draft text,the 2023 final text expands the scope of application of the Anti-Coercion Instrument in terms of content design and authorizes the Council of the EU to determine whether a behavior constitutes"economic coercion,"further clarifying the interests of the EU and reinforcing its strategic goal of promoting strategic autonomy and securing greater geopolitical interests.The entry into force of the Anti-Coercion Instrument will,to a certain extent,aggravate the tendency of politicization and securitization of Sino-European economic and trade relations,increase bilateral economic and trade friction,and reduce the investment confidence of Chinese and European enterprises.In view of this,China should avoid the risk and develop countermeasures through multiple dimensions,including public opinion,diplomatic measures,and legal frameworks.
作者
解楠楠
Xie Nannan(Zhengzhou University)
出处
《国际经济合作》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第4期44-54,93,共12页
Journal of International Economic Cooperation
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目“欧盟战略自主的选择机制、实施路径与中国应对研究”(编号:23CGJ046)。
关键词
《反经济胁迫条例》
经济胁迫
战略自主
经济外交
the Anti-Coercion Instrument
economic coercion
strategic autonomy
economic diplomacy
