摘要
《公司法》第一百九十一条把董事对第三人的责任上升到了一般性规则,但本条最大的问题在于文义解释下董事对第三人责任的内涵模糊,体系解释下第一百九十一条与《公司法》第十一条、《民法典》第六十二条、《民法典》第一千一百九十一条第一款相冲突,责任承担方式的争议将会导致司法适用困境。应当以公司高管行为性质、尊重债权人选择权等原则,调适民法规范与公司法规范适用的紧张度。
Article 191 of the Company Law elevates the liability of directors to third parties to a general rule,but the biggest problem of this article lies in the ambiguity of the connotation of the director's liability to third party under the textual interpretation.The Article 191 of the Company Law,under the systematic interpretation,is in conflict with Article 11 of the Company Law,Article 62 of the Civil Code,and Article 1,191(1)of the Civil Code.In addition,the dispute over the type of liability will lead to the judicial application dilemma.This paper advocates the principles of the nature of the behavior of the company's executives and respects for the creditor's option,in order to adjust the tension between the application of civil law norms and company law norms.
作者
齐恩平
梁崇轩
QI Enping;LIANG Chongxuan
出处
《天津师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
2024年第4期117-124,共8页
Journal of Tianjin Normal University(Social Science)
基金
国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“私权自治的政策之维”(19FFXB060)。
关键词
董事
第三人责任
信义义务
director
third party liability
fiduciary duty
