摘要
目的比较关节镜下改良Mason-Allen(mMA)与缝线桥技术治疗中小型肩袖撕裂的早期疗效。方法选取中小型肩袖撕裂患者60例,分为mMA组和缝线桥组,各30例。mMA组采用mMA技术治疗,缝线桥组采用缝线桥技术治疗。比较两组患者手术时间、锚钉数量、术中出血量、肩关节活动度、疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)评分、Constant-Murley评分和再撕裂率。结果mMA组手术时间短于缝线桥组,术中锚钉使用数量少于缝线桥组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术中出血量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后,两组患者肩关节活动度较术前增大,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者组间肩关节活动度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后,两组患者VAS较术前降低,ASES评分和Constant-Murley评分较术前增高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者组间VAS、ASES评分和Constant-Murley评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者再撕裂率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论关节镜下mMA与缝线桥技术治疗中小型肩袖撕裂的早期疗效相当,但mMA的手术时间更短,锚钉使用量更少。
Objective To compare the early effect of arthroscopic modified Mason-Allen(mMA)and suturebridge technique for small and medium-size rotator cuff tear.Methods 60 patients with small and medium-size rotator cuff tear were divided into mMA group and suture bridge group,30 cases each.The mMA group was treated with mMA technique,and the suture bridge group was treated with suture-bridge technique.The operative time,the number of anchors used,blood loss,shoulder mobility,pain visual analogue scale(VAS),American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons(ASES)scale,the Constant-Murley score and the rate of re-tear were compared between the two groups.Results The operative time and the number of anchors used in mMA group were less than those in suture bridge group(P<0.05),and there was no difference of blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05).After operation,the shoulder joint motion of two groups was increased compared with before operation(P<0.05),and there was no statistical difference between the two groups(P>0.05).After surgery,VAS of the two groups was lower than that before surgery,ASES scale and Constant-Murley scores were higher than those before surgery(P<0.05),there was no difference in VAS,ASES and Constant-Murley scores between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no difference in re-tear rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Arthroscopic mMA is similar to suture-bridge technique in the treatment of small and medium-size rotator cuff tear,but operative time of mMA is shorter and it requires less anchors.
作者
王立晖
梁汉荣
黄敏华
潘伟汉
臧学慧
Wang Lihui;Liang Hanrong;Huang Minhua;Pan Weihan;Zang Xuehui(Department of Orthopaedics,School of Medicine,South China University of Technology(Foshan Nanhai District People's Hospital),Foshan,Guangdong 528200,China;Operating Room,School of Medicine,South China University of Technology(Foshan Nanhai District People's Hospital),Foshan,Guangdong 528200,China;Department of Ultrasound Medicine,the Sixth Affiliated Hospital,School of Medicine,South China University of Technology(Foshan Nanhai District People's Hospital),Foshan,Guangdong 528200,China)
出处
《中国内镜杂志》
2024年第7期16-23,共8页
China Journal of Endoscopy
基金
佛山市自筹经费类科技计划项目(No:2220001004930)。
