摘要
专利侵权诉讼中,合法来源抗辩常常作为销售者免除侵权赔偿责任的重要法定理由,但该抗辩在司法实践中并不经常得到法院的支持。本文通过对63件相关案例的实证分析,发现法院在该类案件中积累了一定的经验,但还存在证据认定标准不一、举证责任分配不明确的问题,针对合法来源抗辩法律适用中存在的问题,可从以下方便予以完善,包括对不同主体分配不同证明责任,对其证据的要求也应有所区别,以及追加第三人过程中需保障司法效率和当事人诉讼权利的平衡等,以期为今后的法律实务工作提供参考方向。
In patent infringement litigation,the legal source defense is often used as an important legal reason for the seller to avoid the liability for infringement compensation,but it is not always supported by the court in judicial practice.Through the empirical analysis of 63 relevant cases,it is found that the court has accumulated certain experience in such cases,but there are still problems such as different standards for determining evidence and unclear distribution of burden of proof.In view of the problems existing in the application of legal source defense,the following aspects can be improved:different subjects should be assigned different burden of proof,the requirements for their evidence should be different,and the balance of the judicial efficiency and litigation rights of the parties should be guaranteed in the process of adding a third party,so as to provide a reference direction for future legal practice.
作者
罗宗奎
张袁然
李明达
LUO Zongkui;ZHANG Yuanran;LI Mingda(Law School/Intellectual Property School,Zhongyuan University of Technology,Zhengzhou 450007)
出处
《中国发明与专利》
2024年第7期74-80,共7页
China Invention & Patent
关键词
专利侵权
合法来源抗辩
举证责任
patent infringement
legal source defense
burden of proof
