摘要
《唐两京城坊考》所记东京洛阳宫城建筑的名称与位置存在讹误,具体包括:未注意《河南志》丽景夹城史料出自《唐六典》,在引用该书时误作丽景门夹城;在利用《河南志》所记九洲池方位时节录失当,且考订结果与他书所记以及考古发现不符;引用《河南志》所记安福殿时误作安福门;未重视《唐六典》不同版本间的文字差异,误改长寿殿作仁寿殿;未注意《两京新记》等提示,信从《河南志》误书阊阖阙为阊阖阁;未留意《河南志》“宋城阙古迹”卷蕴含的唐末洛阳宫城史料,将左右银台门视作无考建筑;信从《玉海》所引《河南志》异文,错记太和门位置;忽视宫城建筑前后更名顺序,信从《禁扁》所记,将新旧两处延义门混淆;受《资治通鉴》胡三省注影响,误认为皇城别名宝城。
There are some errors in the building information and location of Luoyang Palace recorded in the Tang LiangJing ChengFang Kao(《唐两京城坊考》).Firstly,this book did not pay attention to the record about the lijing jiacheng(丽景夹城)in Henan Zhi(《河南志》)cited from the book of Tang Liudian(《唐六典》).And it is the reason why this book writes Lijingmen jiacheng(丽景门夹城).Secondly,the location of Jiuzhou chi(九州池)recorded in Henan zhi was not correct,and it could not accord with other records and archaeological achievement.Thirdly,this book mistook the Anfu Hall(安福殿)recorded in Henan Zhi as Anfu Gate.Fouthly,this book mistook the Changshou Hall(长寿殷)recorded in Tang Liudian as Renshou Hall(仁寿殿).Fifthly,this book mistook the Changhe que(闻阖阙)in Henan Zhi as Changhe pavilion(间阁阁).Sixthly,this book overlooked the specific materials of Henan Zhi,and thought that the location of Yin-tai Gate(银台门)could not be verified.Seventhly,this book mistook the location of Taihe Gate(太和门)by quoting a different version of Henan Zhi.Eighthly,this book overlooked the naming order of buildings,and confused the new and old Yanyi Gate(延义门).Lastly,this book was influenced by Hu Sanxing's research in his book of Zizhi Tongjian(《资治通鉴》),and mistook Imperial City as Baocheng City.
作者
贾鸿源
Jia Hongyuan(School of History and Culture,Ludong University,264025)
出处
《中国历史地理论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第2期153-160,共8页
Journal of Chinese Historical Geography
关键词
《唐两京城坊考》
东京宫城
建筑名称
建筑方位
布局变迁
Tang LiangJing ChengFang Kao
Luoyang Palace
Building information
Building location
Overall arrangement changes
