摘要
人工智能的勃兴推动了自动化行政的发展。算法是实现自动化行政的手段,手段应服务于目的。自动化行政目的分为法意目的和工程目的,内含“范围”“价值”“效果”基准,构成了算法目的范式。算法目的失范自算法规则制定伊始就已伴生,呈现出越权隐患、价值迷失、系统缺陷等样态。算法规则是特殊行政规范,应当以比例原则为检视路径审查具体算法规则的正当性,并围绕事前算法制定环节、事中算法运行环节、事后算法审查环节整体性构建关于算法目的的公法规制框架,以系统治理算法目的失范。
The rise of artificial intelligence has driven the development of automated administration.Algorithms are the driving force behind this automation,with the belief that means should serve the ends.The purposes of automated administration,consisting of legal-intent ones and engineering ones,encompass benchmarks such as"scope,""value"and"effect,"which form the paradigm of the algorithmic purposes.The issue of algorithmic purpose going astray has been inherent since the formulation of algorithmic rules,resulting in risks of overstepping,confusion of values,system defects,and other challenges.Algorithmic rules serve as specific administrative norms and should be assessed for legitimacy using the principle of proportionality.This involves designing a comprehensive public law framework that govern the purposes of algorithms throughout the stages of pre-algorithm formulation,in-algorithm operation,and post-algorithm review to systematically govern the issue of algorithmic purpose going astray.
出处
《比较法研究》
北大核心
2024年第2期17-31,共15页
Journal of Comparative Law
基金
国家社科基金项目“我国无人机监管模式的公法建构研究”(项目批准号:20BFX042)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
自动化行政
算法目的失范
比例原则
公法规制
automated administration
algorithmic purpose going astray
proportionality principle
regulation of public law
