摘要
随着中国企业从“中国制造”加速迈向“中国智造”,高效的团队知识共享日益成为中国企业自主创新的重要基石。聚焦团队情境中的揭短型知识共享,将揭短型知识共享细分为“揭自短”和“揭他短”两种类型,探究了在集体主义、面子取向和团队成员交换协同作用下团队揭短型知识共享意愿的生成机理。通过对长三角地区高新技术企业的286份问卷和情境脚本数据分析,结果表明:(1)集体主义与面子取向对团队揭短型知识共享意愿存在正负二元功效,其中集体主义促进两类揭短型知识共享意愿,面子取向抑制两类揭短型知识共享意愿;(2)在注重“礼尚往来”的关系型中国社会,团队交换关系作为重要的权变机制可同步削弱集体主义和弱面子取向对两类揭短型知识共享意愿的影响功效。
As Chinese companies accelerate their shift from“Made in China”to“Created in China”,efficient team knowledge sharing is increasingly becoming a crucial cornerstone for independent innovation within these companies.Based on the valence of knowledge content,team knowledge sharing can be divided into positive content(eg successful experiences)knowledge sharing and negative content(eg lessons from failure)knowledge sharing.While both contribute to enhancing a company’s innovation efficiency,existing studies mostly focus on general knowledge sharing(without distinguishing the valence of knowledge content)or on positive content knowledge sharing,with little attention paid to focusing on negative content knowledge sharing.According to the viewpoint of“culture relativism”,due to the influence of traditional cultures in different countries/regions,team members from different countries/regions have markedly different motivations,attitudes,and intentions towards knowledge sharing.Chinese traditional culture has profound and unique values and claims,which guide the willingness of Chinese corporate team members to share knowledge profoundly and for a long time.Therefore,exploring the generating mechanism of team members’negative content knowledge sharing intention from the perspective of the Chinese traditional culture is an interesting and important research topic.Due to the fact that team members’negative content knowledge sharing exposes the shortcomings of team members,in the Chinese context,this is considered a typical“revealing shortcomings”behavior.Therefore,this paper names it as team members’“Revealing Shortcoming Knowledge Sharing”(RSKS).Based on the identity of a person whose weaknesses are exposed,this paper further subdivides it into two types,i.e.“Self-revealing Shortcoming Knowledge Sharing”(SRSKS)and“Other-revealing Shortcoming Knowledge Sharing”(ORSKS).Built on the literature review,this paper selects collectivism and face orientation as representative variables of the Chin
作者
金辉
王超伟
刁品昊
JIN Hui;WANG Chaowei;DIAO Pinhao(School of Economics and Management,Jiangsu University of Science and Technology,Zhenjiang 212100,China)
出处
《运筹与管理》
CSCD
北大核心
2024年第2期226-232,共7页
Operations Research and Management Science
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目(23AGL024)。
